Literature DB >> 15172520

The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words.

Marcus Taft1, Paul Kougious.   

Abstract

The word virus is not normally considered polymorphemic, yet it is clearly both semantically and orthographically related to the word viral. Thus, the subunit vir takes on the role of a bound morpheme. In contrast, the words future and futile also share a subunit (fut), but are semantically unrelated. The reported experiment demonstrates facilitation in a masked priming experiment for the semantically related pairs that share an initial orthographic subunit (e.g., virus-viral), but not for the semantically unrelated pairs (e.g., future-futile). Whether the subunit was pronounced the same way in the prime and target was shown to be irrelevant. Furthermore, semantic relatedness was insufficient to produce priming when orthography was not shared. It was concluded that, while the units of processing within the orthographic system may be the same for the two types of item, their representation at a higher level may depend on the correlation between form with meaning. For example, virus and viral might share a higher level representation and thus facilitate each other, whereas future and futile might be represented separately at that higher level and even compete with each other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172520     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  10 in total

1.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: the case of prefixed words.

Authors:  Kevin Diependaele; Dominiek Sandra; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

2.  An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Rebecca L Johnson; Jennifer Brewer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-04

3.  Phonological constraints on the assembly of skeletal structure in reading.

Authors:  Michal Marom; Iris Berent
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-07-31

4.  Sub- and supralexical information in early phases of lexical access.

Authors:  Juhani Järvikivi; Pirita Pyykkönen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-25

5.  Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12

6.  Take a stand on understanding: electrophysiological evidence for stem access in German complex verbs.

Authors:  Eva Smolka; Matthias Gondan; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Must analysis of meaning follow analysis of form? A time course analysis.

Authors:  Laurie B Feldman; Petar Milin; Kit W Cho; Fermín Moscoso Del Prado Martín; Patrick A O'Connor
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming.

Authors:  Joyse Medeiros; Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-14

9.  Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning.

Authors:  William D Marslen-Wilson; Mirjana Bozic; Billi Randall
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-18

10.  Evidence from neglect dyslexia for morphological decomposition at the early stages of orthographic-visual analysis.

Authors:  Julia Reznick; Naama Friedmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.