Literature DB >> 15170794

Expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: prediction of successful outcome using decision tree analysis.

J Elson1, A Tailor, S Banerjee, R Salim, K Hillaby, D Jurkovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether a decision tree based on a combination of clinical, morphological and biochemical parameters could be constructed to help in the selection of women with tubal ectopic pregnancies for expectant management.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study in a tertiary referral early pregnancy unit in an inner city teaching hospital. The study group consisted of 179 women with ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Demographic, clinical and ultrasound data were recorded in each case at the initial visit. In addition all women had a blood sample taken for the measurements of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) and progesterone. Clinically stable women with non-viable pregnancies and no signs of hematoperitoneum were managed expectantly on an outpatient basis until their serum beta-hCG declined to <20 IU/L. Women who developed pelvic pain during follow-up and those with non-declining serum beta-hCG were offered surgery.
RESULTS: A total of 107/179 (59.8%) tubal ectopics were considered suitable for expectant management. Ectopic pregnancy resolved spontaneously in 75/107 (70%) women, which was 41.9% of the total number of tubal ectopics. Maternal age, initial serum beta-hCG and progesterone were all significantly different in pregnancies that resolved spontaneously compared to those requiring surgery (P < 0.05). Initial serum beta-hCG level was the best predictor of the outcome of expectant management. These differences enabled a construction of a four-level decision tree to estimate the likelihood of successful expectant management.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in demographic, ultrasound and biochemical findings between spontaneously resolving ectopics and those requiring treatment. Decision tree analysis may be used as a guide to estimate the probability of successful expectant management in individual cases. Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170794     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  22 in total

Review 1.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-16

Review 3.  Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  P J Hajenius; F Mol; B W J Mol; P M M Bossuyt; W M Ankum; F van der Veen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 4.  Tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-04-20

5.  Treatment of an Ectopic Pregnancy: An Ethical Reanalysis.

Authors:  Maureen L Condic; Donna Harrison
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2018-06-18

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather Murray; Hanadi Baakdah; Trevor Bardell; Togas Tulandi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Optimal treatment for women with a persisting pregnancy of unknown location, a randomized controlled trial: The ACT-or-NOT trial.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Mary D Sammel; Mary Stephenson; Jared Robins; Karl R Hansen; Wahid A Youssef; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Retrospective analysis of laparoscopic salpingostomy and conservative expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Kunitomo Takashima; Hiroshi Yoshida; Mariko Murase; Aya Sato; Hideya Sakakibara; Fumiki Hirahara; Masahiko Ishikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 9.  Serum markers in the diagnosis of tubal pregnancy.

Authors:  Fabio Roberto Cabar; Paula Beatriz Fettback; Pedro Paulo Pereira; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Unexpected rupture of an expectantly managed tubal ectopic pregnancy: a reminder for enhanced diligence.

Authors:  Amenda Ann Davis; Kusum Lata; Akshita Panwar; Alka Kriplani
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.