Literature DB >> 15170706

Variability in quantitative measurement of the same segment with two different intravascular ultrasound systems: in vivo and in vitro studies.

Yuxin Li1, Junko Honye, Satoshi Saito, Tadateru Takayama, Shin-Ichiro Yokoyama, Tadahiro Saruya, Motoko Kotani, Kazuo Harasawa, Hideyuki Ando, Masayoshi Endo, Katsuo Kanmatsuse.   

Abstract

We evaluated two different intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems, Atlantis and Intrafocus, to verify their accuracy and reproducibility. In an in vivo study on 20 consecutive patients with coronary artery diseases, the minimum lumen diameter (MLD), vessel diameter, lumen area (LA), vessel area, plaque area, and area stenosis rate (% AS) were respectively measured. In an in vitro study, MLD and LA were measured in four metal tubes with different diameters. All of the measured values except for % AS by Atlantis were significantly larger than the values obtained with Intrafocus. Nonuniform rotational distortion (NURD) was estimated as 34% in Atlantis and 1% in Intrafocus. The measurements by Atlantis were larger than the true values while the measurements by Intrafocus were less than the true values in all four metal tubes. These findings suggest that we should clearly avoid the use of different IVUS systems in the same study. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170706     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  In vivo variability in quantitative coronary ultrasound and tissue characterization measurements with mechanical and phased-array catheters.

Authors:  Gastón A Rodriguez-Granillo; Eugène P McFadden; Jiro Aoki; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Evelyn Regar; Nico Bruining; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Dedicated calibration formulas permit correction of differences between measurements by different IVUS devices as demonstrated in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries in vitro.

Authors:  Marc Hartmann; Clemens von Birgelen; Gary S Mintz; Nadine Deppermann; Olaf Dirsch; Martin G Stoel; Gert K van Houwelingen; Hans W Louwerenburg; Patrick M J Verhorst; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (2021).

Authors:  Yuichi Saito; Yoshio Kobayashi; Kenichi Fujii; Shinjo Sonoda; Kenichi Tsujita; Kiyoshi Hibi; Yoshihiro Morino; Hiroyuki Okura; Yuji Ikari; Junko Honye
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-11-12

4.  Comparison of quantitative measurements between two different intravascular ultrasound catheters and consoles: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okura; Makoto Watanabe; Akihiro Miura; Muneo Kurokawa; Tomoya Ueda; Tsunenari Soeda; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-02-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.