| Literature DB >> 15170706 |
Yuxin Li1, Junko Honye, Satoshi Saito, Tadateru Takayama, Shin-Ichiro Yokoyama, Tadahiro Saruya, Motoko Kotani, Kazuo Harasawa, Hideyuki Ando, Masayoshi Endo, Katsuo Kanmatsuse.
Abstract
We evaluated two different intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) systems, Atlantis and Intrafocus, to verify their accuracy and reproducibility. In an in vivo study on 20 consecutive patients with coronary artery diseases, the minimum lumen diameter (MLD), vessel diameter, lumen area (LA), vessel area, plaque area, and area stenosis rate (% AS) were respectively measured. In an in vitro study, MLD and LA were measured in four metal tubes with different diameters. All of the measured values except for % AS by Atlantis were significantly larger than the values obtained with Intrafocus. Nonuniform rotational distortion (NURD) was estimated as 34% in Atlantis and 1% in Intrafocus. The measurements by Atlantis were larger than the true values while the measurements by Intrafocus were less than the true values in all four metal tubes. These findings suggest that we should clearly avoid the use of different IVUS systems in the same study. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15170706 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20052
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ISSN: 1522-1946 Impact factor: 2.692