Literature DB >> 15170614

Comparison of continuous and discontinuous FK506 administration on autograft or allograft repair of sciatic nerve resection.

Esther Udina1, Bruce G Gold, Xavier Navarro.   

Abstract

An immunosuppressant drug that also possesses neuroregenerative properties, FK506 enhances the rate of axonal regeneration and improves recovery after nerve lesions. Nevertheless, prolonged immunosuppression may not be justified to assure the success of nerve regeneration. In this study, we compare the effects of continuous and discontinuous FK506 treatment on regeneration and reinnervation after sciatic nerve resection repaired with autologous or allogenic grafts in the mouse. For each type of repair, one group received FK506 (5 mg/kg) for 4 months, whereas a second group was treated with FK506 at 5 mg/kg for 5 weeks followed by 3 mg/kg for 4 weeks; a control group received saline only. Functional reinnervation was assessed by noninvasive methods to determine recovery of motor, sensory, and autonomic functions in the hind paw over 4 months after operation. Morphological analysis of the regenerated nerves was performed at the termination of the study. Autografts and allografts treated with sustained FK506 (5 mg/kg) reached high levels of reinnervation and followed a course of recovery faster than controls. The numbers of myelinated fibers also were similar. Allografts without immunosuppression demonstrated a slower rate of regeneration, exhibiting lower final levels of recovery compared with other groups and containing fewer numbers of regenerating myelinated fibers. Withdrawal of immunosuppressant therapy resulted in a decline in the degree of reinnervation in all functions tested during the third month, with stabilization between the third and fourth months. The number of regenerated myelinated fibers in the group was significantly lower than in autografts. Thus, continuous or discontinuous FK506 administration slightly accelerated the rate of reinnervation in autografts. In allograft repair, FK506 significantly enhanced both the rate and degree of regeneration and recovery, but its withdrawal resulted in graft rejection, a marked deterioration in function, and loss of regenerating fibers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15170614     DOI: 10.1002/mus.20029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  9 in total

1.  Dynamic quantification of host Schwann cell migration into peripheral nerve allografts.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Whitlock; Terence M Myckatyn; Alice Y Tong; Andrew Yee; Ying Yan; Christina K Magill; Philip J Johnson; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Composition-property relationships for an experimental composite nerve guidance conduit: evaluating cytotoxicity and initial tensile strength.

Authors:  S Kehoe; X F Zhang; D Boyd
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Localized delivery of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells to peripheral nerve allografts promotes regeneration of branched segmental defects.

Authors:  Kelly C Santos Roballo; Subash Dhungana; Zhongliang Jiang; John Oakey; Jared S Bushman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Modeling diffusion-based drug release inside a nerve conduit in vitro and in vivo validation study.

Authors:  Pratima Labroo; Scott Ho; Himanshu Sant; Jill E Shea; Jayant Agarwal; Bruce Gale
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Tissue engineered constructs for peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  P J Johnson; M D Wood; A M Moore; S E Mackinnon
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.953

6.  Effect of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Immunosuppressants on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stéphanie Farias Seixas; Gabriele Carra Forte; Gabriela Agne Magnus; Valentina Stanham; Rita Mattiello; Jefferson Braga Silva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-27

7.  Early clinical outcomes with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of sensory defects within the hand.

Authors:  Furkan E Karabekmez; Ahmet Duymaz; Steven L Moran
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-05-02

8.  Storage and allogeneic transplantation of peripheral nerve using a green tea polyphenol solution in a canine model.

Authors:  Ken Nakayama; Ryosuke Kakinoki; Ryosuke Ikeguchi; Tomoyuki Yamakawa; Soichi Ohta; Satoshi Fujita; Takashi Noguchi; Scott Fm Duncan; Suong-Hyu Hyon; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2010-11-28

9.  Controlled release of FK506 from micropatterned PLGA films: potential for application in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Brett Davis; Susan Wojtalewicz; Pratima Labroo; Jill Shea; Himanshu Sant; Bruce Gale; Jayant Agarwal
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.135

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.