Literature DB >> 1516983

Efficacy of varicocele embolization versus ligation of the left internal spermatic vein for improvement of sperm quality.

H Yavetz1, R Levy, J Papo, L Yogev, G Paz, A J Jaffa, Z T Homonnai.   

Abstract

Efficacy of surgical varicocelectomy versus embolization of the spermatic vein was studied in 137 men diagnosed as suffering from left varicocele. The men were divided randomly into three groups according to the methods of treatment: A--embolization of the internal spermatic vein (51 men); B--Ivanissevich technique of high ligation of the spermatic veins (43 men); and C--Bernardi technique of high ligation (43 men). The groups were similar in terms of age, duration of infertility and possessed semen characterized as oligoteratoasthenozoospermia. The fertility of the female partners was evaluated carefully and they were found to be potentially fertile. Varicocele was diagnosed by at least two of the following methods: physical palpation during valsalva manoeuvre, venography, or scrotal scanning using the technetium pertechnetate radioactive method. Semen quality was assessed before treatment and at 3, 6 and 9 months post-treatment. Fecundity was followed-up for 18 months. The major results were: (i) Shrinkage of the varicocele was found in all three groups studied. The same rate of recurrence was recorded in the three groups (24%, 37% and 35% in groups A, B and C, respectively). (ii) Improvement of sperm quality was significant in groups A and B, with better results in group B. (iii) The pregnancy rate was significantly higher in group B, compared with A (38.2% vs. 20.6%; P less than 0.05). Thus, high ligation of the internal spermatic vein yields better results than low ligation or embolization as far as semen quality and pregnancy is concerned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1516983     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1992.tb01133.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  8 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Varicocele.

Authors:  Rebecca Macleod; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jon Cartledge; Ian Eardley
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-07-13

Review 3.  Varicocele.

Authors:  Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jon Cartledge; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-01-06

Review 4.  Varicocele and male infertility.

Authors:  Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter Østergren; James M Dupree; Dana A Ohl; Jens Sønksen; Mikkel Fode
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Emma Persad; Clare Aa O'Loughlin; Simi Kaur; Gernot Wagner; Nina Matyas; Melanie Rosalia Hassler-Di Fratta; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-23

6.  Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs. percutaneous embolization in infertile men: Prospective comparison of reproductive and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Elie Bou Nasr; Mouath Binhazzaa; Thierry Almont; Pascal Rischmann; Michel Soulie; Eric Huyghe
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Shu-Jie Xia; Zhi-Hong Liu; Le Tao; Ji-Fu Ge; Chen-Min Xu; Jian-Xin Qiu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Recurrent varicocele.

Authors:  Katherine Rotker; Mark Sigman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.