Literature DB >> 15168899

Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study.

Liina Pylkkänen1, Sophie Feintuch, Emily Hopkins, Alec Marantz.   

Abstract

Schreuder and Baayen (Schreuder. R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 118-139) report that lexical decision times to nouns are not sensitive to the cumulative frequency of the noun's morphological derivatives in its "morphological family", even though such a cumulative frequency effect is obtained in the domain of inflection. Under a decomposition view of derivational morphology, this constitutes a puzzling exception to the robust finding that lexical frequency is one of the major determinants of behavioral response latencies. If morphologically complex words are decomposed, each occurrence of a member of a noun's morphological family should add to its root-frequency. We investigated the effects of morphological family frequency on the magnetoencephalographic response component M350, which shows sensitivity to factors affecting early stages of lexical processing, including lexical frequency. We hypothesized that high morphological family frequency should have a facilitory effect on the M350, even though no such effect can be seen in response time, presumably due to competition among possible root-affix combinations. Contrary to this hypothesis, we found that high family frequency elicits an M350 inhibition, suggesting that competition among morphological family members occurs at the M350. The result is significant, since there is evidence that competition among phonologically similar words occurs after, not at, the M350. Thus, our results suggest that competition within a morphological family precedes competition within a phonological similarity neighborhood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15168899     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

1.  The effect of family size on spanish simple and complex words.

Authors:  Miguel Lázaro; Javier S Sainz
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-06

2.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Masked repetition priming using magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Philip J Monahan; Robert Fiorentino; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Computational Modeling of Morphological Effects in Bangla Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Tirthankar Dasgupta; Manjira Sinha; Anupam Basu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

5.  How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.

Authors:  Laura Gwilliams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov; Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification.

Authors:  Simona Amenta; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-12

8.  Spelling and Meaning of Compounds in the Early School Years through Classroom Games: An Intervention Study.

Authors:  Styliani N Tsesmeli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.