Literature DB >> 15167985

Establishing the compliance in elderly women for use of a low level mechanical stress device in a clinical osteoporosis study.

Marian T Hannan1, Debbie M Cheng, Emily Green, Cherie Swift, Clinton T Rubin, Douglas P Kiel.   

Abstract

Non-pharmacologic approaches to prevent bone loss are well suited for elderly patients to avoid polypharmacy and medication side effects. One potential treatment is a vibrating platform that delivers low-level mechanical loading stimulating bone remodeling. However, compliance is a major concern with any daily treatment, and is unknown for an elderly group using this device. Thus we assessed compliance with standing 10 min/day on a vibrating platform device in elderly women, the target population for osteoporosis therapy. We also assessed satisfaction with daily use of the device. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded 6-month study for daily use of a 10-min vibrating platform treatment in elderly women who were residents of a Continuing Care Retirement community. Compliance for each subject was calculated as the number of days attended divided by the 182 days in the 6-month trial. The 24 elderly women (mean age 86, range 79-92 years) had 83% compliance (95% CI: 70.5, 94.5) for daily treatment over 6 months. Excluding three study drop-outs, the 21 women had 93% compliance (95% CI: 89.8, 95.6), with no difference in compliance between active and placebo treatment. Main reasons for missing treatment days over the 6 months were vacation (54% of missed days) and illness (29%). Three adverse events occurred; one (syncope) was possibly related to device use, whereas the other two were not related to device use. Among participants, 95% reported overall satisfaction with daily use of the vibrating platform, and 57% preferred the platform versus daily oral medications for prevention of bone loss. Elderly women showed high compliance, high satisfaction and few adverse experiences with a daily non-pharmacological treatment designed to inhibit bone loss. Larger randomized controlled trials should evaluate the long-term efficacy of vibrating platform devices for treatment of low bone mass and osteoporosis in elderly individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15167985     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1637-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  42 in total

1.  Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains.

Authors:  S P Fritton; K J McLeod; C T Rubin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; C Mallinckrodt; C Jerome; K McLeod; S Bain
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones.

Authors:  C Rubin; A S Turner; S Bain; C Mallinckrodt; K McLeod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C Rubin; G Xu; S Judex
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A Fiatarone; C M Morganti; I Trice; R A Greenberg; W J Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Pharmacologic therapy for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B McClung; M McClung
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.208

8.  The role of adherence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic interventions: evidence from the delirium prevention trial.

Authors:  Sharon K Inouye; Sidney T Bogardus; Christianna S Williams; Linda Leo-Summers; Joseph V Agostini
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-28

9.  High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians. Effects on skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Fiatarone; E C Marks; N D Ryan; C N Meredith; L A Lipsitz; W J Evans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Improving patient compliance: a major goal in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; David H G Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  9 in total

1.  Low-Magnitude Mechanical Stimulation to Improve Bone Density in Persons of Advanced Age: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Douglas P Kiel; Marian T Hannan; Bruce A Barton; Mary L Bouxsein; Emily Sisson; Thomas Lang; Brett Allaire; Dawn Dewkett; Danette Carroll; Jay Magaziner; Elizabeth Shane; Elizabeth Teng Leary; Sheryl Zimmerman; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Relationship of bone health to yearlong physical activity in older Japanese adults: cross-sectional data from the Nakanojo Study.

Authors:  H Park; F Togo; E Watanabe; A Yasunaga; S Park; R J Shephard; Y Aoyagi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Insights from the conduct of a device trial in older persons: low magnitude mechanical stimulation for musculoskeletal health.

Authors:  Douglas P Kiel; Marian T Hannan; Bruce A Barton; Mary L Bouxsein; Thomas F Lang; Kathleen M Brown; Elizabeth Shane; Jay Magaziner; Sheryl Zimmerman; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  The Efficacy of Low-intensity Vibration to Improve Bone Health in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease Is Highly Dependent on Compliance and Muscle Response.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Mary B Leonard; Elizabeth A Kobe; Michelle A Slinger; Kelly A Borges; Erica Billig; Clinton T Rubin; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Ete Chan; Gunes Uzer; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Vibration Therapy to Prevent Bone Loss and Falls: Mechanisms and Efficacy.

Authors:  Belinda R Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  A randomized controlled trial of whole body vibration exposure on markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sarah Turner; Margaret Torode; Mike Climstein; Geraldine Naughton; David Greene; Michael K Baker; Maria A Fiatarone Singh
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2011-06-27

8.  Effect of electrical stimulation-induced muscle force and streptomycin treatment on muscle and trabecular bone mass in early-stage disuse musculoskeletal atrophy.

Authors:  H Tamaki; K Yotani; F Ogita; K Sugawara; H Kirimto; H Onishi; N Kasuga; N Yamamoto
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 9.  Characteristics of community-based exercise programs for community-dwelling older adults in rural/regional areas: a scoping review.

Authors:  Samantha Fien; Corey Linton; Jules S Mitchell; Daniel P Wadsworth; Helen Szabo; Christopher D Askew; Mia A Schaumberg
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.636

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.