Literature DB >> 15166953

Appropriate timing of cholecystectomy in patients who present with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collections.

William H Nealon1, John Bawduniak, Eric M Walser.   

Abstract

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Standard management of gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis calls for cholecystectomy to be performed during the same hospitalization after acute symptoms have subsided. However, infectious complications are common when cholecystectomy is performed sooner than 3 weeks after severe acute pancreatitis. Fluid collections, common in patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis, are additionally problematic. No previous study has examined the role of peripancreatic fluid collections and subsequent pseudocyst in outcomes after cholecystectomy in these patients.
OBJECTIVES: We compare results of delaying cholecystectomy after moderate to severe acute pancreatitis with early cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Since 1987, all patients with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis and associated fluid collections were addressed. Moderate to severe acute pancreatitis was defined as > 5 Ranson prognostic indicators. Fluid collection was established by computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients were evaluated for duration of hospitalization, complications of cholecystectomy, resolution or persistence of pseudocysts, nonoperative interventions performed on pseudocysts, intercurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis during the monitoring period, episodes of sepsis, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 187 patients with moderate to severe gallstone-associated acute pancreatitis survived their acute stage; 151 had peripancreatic fluid collections. Seventy-eight of the 187 had early cholecystectomy, 62 of whom had fluid collections; 109 were monitored before cholecystectomy, 89 of whom had fluid collections. Fluid collections resolved without intervention in 36 (40%) of 89 in the monitored group and in 13 (21%) of 62 in the early cholecystectomy group. Percutaneous drainage was performed in 16 (18%) of 89 in the monitored group and in 31 (50%) of 62 in the early cholecystectomy group. Sepsis occurred in 6 (7%) of 89 in the monitored group and 29 (47%) of 62 in the early cholecystectomy group. Complications of cholecystectomy occurred in 6 (5.5%) of 109 of the monitored patients and in 34 (44%) of 78 in the early cholecystectomy group. Fifty-three patients in the monitored group and 49 patients in the early cholecystectomy group required operative pseudocyst-enterostomy. This procedure was combined with cholecystectomy in the monitored patients. Mean hospitalization was longer in the early operation group.
CONCLUSION: Cholecystectomy should be delayed in patients who survive an episode of moderate to severe acute biliary pancreatitis and demonstrate peripancreatic fluid collections or pseudocysts until the pseudocysts either resolve or persist beyond 6 weeks, at which time pseudocyst drainage can safely be combined with cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166953      PMCID: PMC1356283          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000128688.97556.94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

1.  Pancreatic endotherapy for pseudocysts and fluid collections.

Authors:  Stephen M Schutz; Joseph W C Leung
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Main pancreatic ductal anatomy can direct choice of modality for treating pancreatic pseudocysts (surgery versus percutaneous drainage).

Authors:  William H Nealon; Eric Walser
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Acute gallstone pancreatitis: timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in mild and severe disease.

Authors:  W Uhl; C A Müller; L Krähenbühl; S W Schmid; S Schölzel; M W Büchler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections.

Authors:  R A Kozarek; T J Ball; D J Patterson; P C Freeny; J A Ryan; L W Traverso
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Timing of cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission and after recurrent biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Orhan Alimoglu; Orhan V Ozkan; Mustafa Sahin; Adem Akcakaya; Ramazan Eryilmaz; Gurhan Bas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts with percutaneous drainage and octreotide. Work in progress.

Authors:  H B D'Agostino; E vanSonnenberg; R B Sanchez; B W Goodacre; R G Villaveiran; K Lyche
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management.

Authors:  G J Vitas; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Acute biliary pancreatitis. The roles of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  A V DeIorio; G C Vitale; M Reynolds; G M Larson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts.

Authors:  P A Grace; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Timing of laparoscopic surgery in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  E Tang; S C Stain; G Tang; E Froes; T V Berne
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-05
View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and therapy of acute pancreatitis].

Authors:  G Adler; H Woehrle
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Early Stage.

Authors:  Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Sorin Traian Barbu; Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu Vasiliu; Radu Costea; Stefan Neagu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

3.  Timing of cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: do the data support current guidelines?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy permits interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with moderately severe gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Ryan Heider; Alphonso Brown; Ian S Grimm; Kevin E Behrns
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Update on pathogenesis and clinical management of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Dulce M Cruz-Santamaría; Carlos Taxonera; Manuel Giner
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-06-15

7.  What is New in Acute Pancreatitis?

Authors:  Vivek Vij; Sanjay Singh Negi; Adarsh Chaudhary
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 8.  Acute pancreatitis during pregnancy: a review.

Authors:  G Ducarme; F Maire; P Chatel; D Luton; P Hammel
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: the optimal choice?

Authors:  Rajeev Sinha
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Early laparoendoscopic rendezvous for acute biliary pancreatitis: preliminary results.

Authors:  G Borzellino; F Lombardo; A M Minicozzi; M Donataccio; C Cordiano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.