Literature DB >> 15166555

Determination of the pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and remifentanil during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children.

David R Drover1, Catherine Litalien, Vinit Wellis, Steven L Shafer, Gregory B Hammer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propofol is commonly used to anesthetize children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Opioids are often used in combination with propofol to provide total intravenous anesthesia. Because both propofol and remifentanil are associated with rapid onset and offset, the combination of these two drugs may be particularly useful for procedures of short duration, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The authors previously demonstrated that the median effective concentration (C50) of propofol during esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children is 3.55 microg/ml. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction of remifentanil and propofol when used in combination for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.
METHODS: The authors studied 32 children aged between 3 and 10 yr who were scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Propofol was administered via a target-controlled infusion system using the STANPUMP software based on a pediatric pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanil was administered as a constant rate infusion of 25, 50, and 100 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) to each of three study groups, respectively. A sigmoid Emax model was developed to describe the interaction of remifentanil and propofol.
RESULTS: There was a positive interaction between remifentanil and propofol when used in combination. The concentration of propofol alone associated with 50% probability of no response was 3.7 microg/ml (SE, 0.4 microg/ml), and this was decreased to 2.8 microg/ml (SE, 0.1 microg/ml) when used in combination with remifentanil.
CONCLUSION: A remifentanil infusion of 25 ng.kg(-1).min(-1) reduces the concentration of propofol required for adequate anesthesia for esophagogastroduodenoscopy from 3.7 to 2.8 microg/ml. Increasing the remifentanil infusion yields minimal additional decrease in propofol concentration and may increase the risk of side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15166555     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  5 in total

1.  EC(50) of remifentanil to prevent withdrawal movement associated with injection of rocuronium.

Authors:  Ji Young Yoon; Hae Kyu Kim; Jae Young Kwon; Sang Wook Shin; Kyung Hoon Kim; Won Sung Kim; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Remifentanil infusion as a modality for opioid-based anaesthesia in paediatric practice.

Authors:  Ahmed Mostafa Abdel Hamid; Ashraf Fawzy Abo Shady; Ehab S Abdel Azeem
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07

3.  Interactions of propofol and remifentanil on bispectral index under 66% N(2)O: analysis by dose-effect curve, isobologram, and combination index.

Authors:  Won Ho Kim; Hyun Joo Ahn; Jie Ae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-12-31

4.  A computerized infusion pump for control of tissue tracer concentration during positron emission tomography in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic measurements.

Authors:  Olof Eriksson; Andreas Wallberg; Stina Syvänen; Raymond Josephsson; Bengt Långström; Mats Bergström
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2008-05-30

5.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of propofol in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: a study using Bispectral index and composite auditory evoked potentials as pharmacodynamic endpoints.

Authors:  Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas; Margreke J E Brill; Mariska Y M Peeters; Dick Tibboel; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.