Literature DB >> 15165607

Error-prone replication for better or worse.

Brigette Tippin1, Phuong Pham, Myron F Goodman.   

Abstract

Precise genome duplication requires accurate copying by DNA polymerases and the elimination of occasional mistakes by proofreading exonucleases and mismatch repair enzymes. The commonly held belief that 'if something is worth doing, then it's worth doing well' normally applies to DNA replication and repair, however, there are exceptions. This review describes elements that are crucial to cell fitness, evolution and survival in the recently discovered error-prone DNA polymerases. Large numbers of errant DNA polymerases, spanning microorganisms to humans, are used to rescue stalled replication forks by copying damaged DNA and even undamaged DNA to generate 'purposeful' mutations that generate genetic diversity in times of stress. Here we focus on low-fidelity polymerases from bacteria, comparing Escherichia coli, archeabacteria and those most recently discovered in Gram-positive Bacilli, Streptococcus, pathogenic Mycobacterium and intein-containing cyanobacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15165607     DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Microbiol        ISSN: 0966-842X            Impact factor:   17.079


  47 in total

1.  Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Shingo Fujii; Robert P Fuchs
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Recruitment of host functions suggests a repair pathway for late steps in group II intron retrohoming.

Authors:  Dorie Smith; Jin Zhong; Manabu Matsuura; Alan M Lambowitz; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Simulating the temporal modulation of inducible DNA damage response in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ming Ni; Si-Yuan Wang; Ji-Kun Li; Qi Ouyang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Selectivity and proofreading both contribute significantly to the fidelity of RNA polymerase III transcription.

Authors:  Nazif Alic; Nayla Ayoub; Emilie Landrieux; Emmanuel Favry; Peggy Baudouin-Cornu; Michel Riva; Christophe Carles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  A dynamic polymerase exchange with Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV replacing DNA polymerase III on the sliding clamp.

Authors:  Asako Furukohri; Myron F Goodman; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  The take and give between retrotransposable elements and their hosts.

Authors:  Arthur Beauregard; M Joan Curcio; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Structure of a small-molecule inhibitor of a DNA polymerase sliding clamp.

Authors:  Roxana E Georgescu; Olga Yurieva; Seung-Sup Kim; John Kuriyan; Xiang-Peng Kong; Mike O'Donnell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  DNA polymerases are error-prone at RecA-mediated recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Richard T Pomerantz; Myron F Goodman; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Insertion of dNTPs opposite the 1,N2-propanodeoxyguanosine adduct by Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV.

Authors:  Yazhen Wang; Sarah K Musser; Sam Saleh; Lawrence J Marnett; Martin Egli; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.