Literature DB >> 15165346

Two visual motion processing deficits in developmental dyslexia associated with different reading skills deficits.

Jeremy B Wilmer1, Alexandra J Richardson, Yue Chen, John F Stein.   

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia is associated with deficits in the processing of visual motion stimuli, and some evidence suggests that these motion processing deficits are related to various reading subskills deficits. However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying such associations. This study lays a richer groundwork for exploration of such mechanisms by more comprehensively and rigorously characterizing the relationship between motion processing deficits and reading subskills deficits. Thirty-six adult participants, 19 of whom had a history of developmental dyslexia, completed a battery of visual, cognitive, and reading tests. This battery combined motion processing and reading subskills measures used across previous studies and added carefully matched visual processing control tasks. Results suggest that there are in fact two distinct motion processing deficits in developmental dyslexia, rather than one as assumed by previous research, and that each of these deficits is associated with a different type of reading subskills deficit. A deficit in detecting coherent motion is selectively associated with low accuracy on reading subskills tests, and a deficit in discriminating velocities is selectively associated with slow performance on these same tests. In addition, evidence from visual processing control tasks as well as self-reports of ADHD symptoms suggests that these motion processing deficits are specific to the domain of visual motion, and result neither from a broader visual deficit, nor from the sort of generalized attention deficit commonly comorbid with developmental dyslexia. Finally, dissociation between these two motion processing deficits suggests that they may have distinct neural and functional underpinnings. The two distinct patterns of motion processing and reading deficits demonstrated by this study may reflect separable underlying neurocognitive mechanisms of developmental dyslexia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15165346     DOI: 10.1162/089892904323057272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Contrast responsivity in MT+ correlates with phonological awareness and reading measures in children.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Robert F Dougherty; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Speed discrimination predicts word but not pseudo-word reading rate in adults and children.

Authors:  Keith L Main; Franco Pestilli; Aviv Mezer; Jason Yeatman; Ryan Martin; Stephanie Phipps; Brian Wandell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  An examination of multiple predictors of orthographic functioning.

Authors:  Glenn R Mesman; Michelle Y Kibby
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2010-06-23

4.  Using perceptual signatures to define and dissociate condition-specific neural etiology: autism and fragile X syndrome as model conditions.

Authors:  Armando Bertone; Julie Hanck; Cary Kogan; Avi Chaudhuri; Kim Cornish
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2010-12

5.  Developmental dyslexia in Chinese and English populations: dissociating the effect of dyslexia from language differences.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Hwee Ling Lee; Qiang Zhang; Tao Liu; Li Bo Geng; Mohamed L Seghier; Clare Shakeshaft; Tae Twomey; David W Green; Yi Ming Yang; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes across bipolar and schizophrenia psychosis.

Authors:  Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  An fMRI study of coherent visual motion processing in children and adults.

Authors:  C M Taylor; O A Olulade; M M Luetje; G F Eden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Strong motion deficits in dyslexia associated with DCDC2 gene alteration.

Authors:  Guido Marco Cicchini; Cecilia Marino; Sara Mascheretti; Daniela Perani; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Abnormal visual motion processing is not a cause of dyslexia.

Authors:  Olumide A Olulade; Eileen M Napoliello; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Improvements in spelling after QEEG-based neurofeedback in dyslexia: a randomized controlled treatment study.

Authors:  Marinus H M Breteler; Martijn Arns; Sylvia Peters; Ine Giepmans; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2009-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.