Mary A Carskadon1, Rachel S Herz. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Sleep Research Laboratory, Brown Medical School/Bradley Hospital, Providence, RI 02906, USA. mary_carskadon@brown.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine olfactory arousal threshold during sleep in comparison to an auditory tone. DESIGN: On night 1, participants rated odor intensity when awake and experienced olfactory stimuli during stage 1 sleep. Night 2 involved stage 2, stage 4, and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep trials using the "staircase" threshold-detection method. Electroencephalogram, electrooculogram, electromyogram, electrocardiogram, and respiration were recorded along with behavioral response. An 800-Hz tone was given on trials when odors failed to arouse. SETTING: Participants slept in individual rooms. Stimulus-delivery systems were operated from a separate room, where an experimenter observed physiologic recordings and behavioral responses. PARTICIPANTS: Three healthy men and 3 women aged 20 to 25 years (mean, 22 years). INTERVENTIONS: Two odorants, peppermint and pyridine, at 4 concentrations were presented through nasal cannulas using an air-dilution olfactometer. Tones were played over a speaker. MEASUREMENTS: Behavioral (button press and oral) responses, electroencephalographic activation, and changes in breathing and heart rate were assessed. RESULTS: Participants responded to odors on 92% of stage 1 sleep trials. Peppermint was ineffective in stages 2, 4, and REM sleep. Pyridine produced behavioral threshold on 45% of stage 2 trials, none in stage 4, and one third of REM sleep trials. Tones were effective on at least 75% of trials. Heart rate increased significantly only following behavioral responses to odors or tones across sleep stages. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that human olfaction is not reliably capable of alerting a sleeper.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine olfactory arousal threshold during sleep in comparison to an auditory tone. DESIGN: On night 1, participants rated odor intensity when awake and experienced olfactory stimuli during stage 1 sleep. Night 2 involved stage 2, stage 4, and rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep trials using the "staircase" threshold-detection method. Electroencephalogram, electrooculogram, electromyogram, electrocardiogram, and respiration were recorded along with behavioral response. An 800-Hz tone was given on trials when odors failed to arouse. SETTING:Participants slept in individual rooms. Stimulus-delivery systems were operated from a separate room, where an experimenter observed physiologic recordings and behavioral responses. PARTICIPANTS: Three healthy men and 3 women aged 20 to 25 years (mean, 22 years). INTERVENTIONS: Two odorants, peppermint and pyridine, at 4 concentrations were presented through nasal cannulas using an air-dilution olfactometer. Tones were played over a speaker. MEASUREMENTS: Behavioral (button press and oral) responses, electroencephalographic activation, and changes in breathing and heart rate were assessed. RESULTS:Participants responded to odors on 92% of stage 1 sleep trials. Peppermint was ineffective in stages 2, 4, and REM sleep. Pyridine produced behavioral threshold on 45% of stage 2 trials, none in stage 4, and one third of REM sleep trials. Tones were effective on at least 75% of trials. Heart rate increased significantly only following behavioral responses to odors or tones across sleep stages. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that human olfaction is not reliably capable of alerting a sleeper.
Authors: Clemens Heiser; Jan Baja; Franziska Lenz; J Ulrich Sommer; Karl Hörmann; Raphael M Herr; Boris A Stuck Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Donald A Wilson; Wenjin Xu; Benjamin Sadrian; Emmanuelle Courtiol; Yaniv Cohen; Dylan C Barnes Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.453
Authors: Rachel S Herz; Eliza Van Reen; David H Barker; Cassie J Hilditch; Ashten L Bartz; Mary A Carskadon Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2017-12-25 Impact factor: 3.160