Literature DB >> 1516303

A comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck.

J S Gebhard1, H C Amstutz, D M Zinar, F J Dorey.   

Abstract

One hundred sixty-six acute, nonpathologic displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients were treated with either unipolar hemiarthroplasty (122 operations; 77 cemented, 45 uncemented) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) (44 operations; all cemented). The average age, (75.2 years of age in the THA group 76.2 years of age in the hemiarthroplasty group), anesthesia risk classification, in-hospital mortality, early complications, and dislocation rates were comparable in each treatment group. In an average long-term follow-up period of 56 months, pain, walking, and function scores were higher with THA than with cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Revision rates were 2.2% after THA, versus 7.9% for cemented hemiarthroplasty and 13% for uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Hemiarthroplasty is recommended for the older patient, who may be occasionally active outside of the household. The healthy, active patient, however, may benefit from THA rather than hemiarthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1516303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Total hip replacement for the treatment of acute femoral neck fractures: results from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales at 3-5 years after surgery.

Authors:  G H Stafford; S C Charman; M J Borroff; C Newell; J K Tucker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Systematic review of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty outcomes for femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Jaimo Ahn; Li-Xing Man; SangDo Park; Jeffrey F Sodl; John L Esterhai
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Total hip arthroplasty for the management of hip fracture: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Jacob B Stirton; Jacob C Maier; Sumon Nandi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-26

4.  Giant cell tumour of the neck of femur treated by total hip replacement.

Authors:  N C Mkandawire
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.875

5.  The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  William W Schairer; Joseph M Lane; David A Halsey; Richard Iorio; Douglas E Padgett; Alexander S McLawhorn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Structural differences between hip endoprostheses, and implications on a hip kinetics.

Authors:  Mirza Biscević; Dragica Smrke
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Amarjit Singh Sidhu; Ajay Pal Singh; Arun Pal Singh; Sukhraj Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the arthroplasty options for displaced femoral neck fractures in the active, healthy, elderly population.

Authors:  James Slover; Michael V Hoffman; Henrik Malchau; Anna N A Tosteson; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  [Risk and prognosis of hip para-articular fractures. A comparison of treatment results of femoral neck and pertrochanteric femoral fractures].

Authors:  H Wissing; T Peterson; A Doht
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1996-04

10.  Treatment of nonunion of femoral neck fracture by valgus osteotomy in 33 cases.

Authors:  Masoud Norouzi; Bahador Alami-Harandi; Mohammad Nasir Naderi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.