Literature DB >> 15162470

Tailoring donor hepatectomy per segment 4 venous drainage in right lobe live donor liver transplantation.

See Ching Chan1, Chung Mau Lo, Chi Leung Liu, Yik Wong, Sheung Tat Fan, John Wong.   

Abstract

Including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right lobe liver graft for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation provides more functional liver by securing adequate venous drainage. Donor outcome of this procedure in relation to different venous drainage patterns of segment 4 is unknown. Modification of graft harvesting technique by preserving segment 4b hepatic vein (V4b) in theory compensates for unfavorable venous drainage patterns. Consecutive 120 right lobe live donors were included. Computed tomography was studied in detail to assign each donor to one of the three types of the Nakamura classification of venous drainage pattern of segment 4. Type I drainage was mainly via the left hepatic vein (LHV), type II drainage was equally into the MHV and LHV, and type III drainage was predominantly into the MHV. Any distinct umbilical vein was also noted. In the early part of the series, the V4b draining into the MHV was divided to provide a long MHV stump in the graft. In the later part of the series, prominent V4b draining into the MHV was preserved in the donor as far as possible. Donor outcomes were measured by peak values of prothrombin time (PT), serum bilirubin and transaminases levels. There was no donor mortality. Type I donors (n=69) had the best outcome with peak PT of 17.9 sec (range 12.3-23.3 sec). Type II donors (n=44) had peak PT of 18.5 sec (range 15.4-24.4 sec). When V4b was preserved in type II donors (n=19), the peak PT (18.0 sec, range 15.4-20.7 sec) became significantly lower than that of type II donors who had V4b sacrificed (20.3 sec, range 16.2-24.4 sec) (P=0.001). A distinct umbilical vein (n=91, 75.8%) was insignificant for donor outcome measured by peak PT. Multivariate analysis identified that type II donors with V4b sacrificed (n=25), type III donors (n=7), and the first 50 cases had less favorable outcomes. In conclusion, unfavorable venous drainage patterns were one of the independent factors compromising postoperative donor liver function, but was circumvented by preservation of V4b.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15162470     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  11 in total

1.  Rescue Living-donor Liver Transplantation for Liver Failure Following Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; William Wei Sharr; Albert Chi Yan Chan; Kenneth Siu Ho Chok; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.740

2.  Remnant left liver size and recovery of living right liver donors.

Authors:  Yuen Ki Fong; See Ching Chan; Tan To Cheung; Wing Chiu Dai; Kenneth S H Chok; Albert C Y Chan; William W Sharr; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.047

3.  Importance of conserving middle hepatic vein distal branches for homogeneous regeneration of the left liver after right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Francois Faitot; Eric Vibert; Chady Salloum; David Lee Gorden; Franck Coscas; René Adam; Denis Castaing
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  The evolution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all?

Authors:  Murat Dayangac; Yaman Tokat
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Toward current standards of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation through the experience of 200 cases.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Risk of venous congestion in live donors of extended right liver graft.

Authors:  Arnold Radtke; George Sgourakis; Ernesto P Molmenti; Susanne Beckebaum; Vito R Cicinnati; Hartmut Schmidt; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Christoph E Broelsch; Massimo Malagó; Tobias Schroeder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Historical perspective of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Validation of graft and standard liver size predictions in right liver living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo; Kenneth S H Chok; William W Sharr; Tan To Cheung; Simon H Y Tsang; Albert C Y Chan; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 9.  Liver retransplantation for adult recipients.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Chul-Soo Ahn; Ki-Hun Kim; Deok-Bog Moon; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Gil-Chun Park; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 10.  Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: Operative techniques to optimize the recipient's outcome.

Authors:  Peng Soon Koh; See Ching Chan
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.