Literature DB >> 27115010

The evolution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all?

Murat Dayangac1, Yaman Tokat1.   

Abstract

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), an adequate hepatic venous outflow constitutes one of the basic principles of a technically successful procedure. The issue of whether the anterior sector (AS) of the right lobe (RL) graft should or should not be routinely drained has been controversial. The aim of this 10-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study was to review the evolution of our hepatic venous outflow reconstruction technique in RL grafts and evaluate the impact of routine AS drainage strategy on the outcome. The study group consisted of 582 primary RL LDLT performed between July 2004 and December 2014. The cases were divided into 3 consecutive periods with different AS venous outflow reconstruction techniques, which included middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage in Era 1 (n=119), a more selective AS drainage with cryopreserved homologous grafts in Era 2 (n=391), and routine segment 5 and/or 8 oriented AS drainage with synthetic grafts in Era 3 (n=72). Intraoperative portal flow measurement with routine splenic artery ligation (SAL) technique (in RL grafts with a portal flow of ≥ 250 mL/min/100 g liver tissue) was added later in Era 3. These 3 groups were compared in terms of recipient and donor demographics, surgical characteristics and short-term outcome. The rate of AS venous drainage varied from 58.8% in Era 1 and 35.0% in Era 2 to 73.6% in Era 3 (P<0.001). Perioperative mortality rate of recipients significantly decreased over the years (15.1% in Era 1 and 8.7% in Era 2 vs. 2.8% in Era 3, P=0.01). After the addition of SAL technique in the 45 cases, there was only 1 graft loss and no perioperative mortality. One-year recipient survival rate was also significantly higher in Era 3 (79.6% in Era 1 and 86.1% in Era 2 vs. 92.1% in Era 3, P=0.002). Routine AS drainage via segment 5 and/or 8 veins using synthetic grafts is a technique to fit all RL grafts in LDLT. Addition of SAL effectively prevents early graft dysfunction and significantly improves the outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); hepatic venous outflow; middle hepatic vein (MHV)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27115010      PMCID: PMC4824737          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.08.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  26 in total

1.  V5-drainage-preserved right lobe grafts improve graft congestion for living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Takeo Toshima; Akinobu Taketomi; Toru Ikegami; Takasuke Fukuhara; Hiroto Kayashima; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Yuji Soejima; Ken Shirabe; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Right anterior sector drainage in right-lobe live-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sheung-Tat Fan; Vanessa H De Villa; Tetsuya Kiuchi; Sung-Gyu Lee; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients.

Authors:  S-G Lee
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Congestion of right liver graft in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Lee; K Park; S Hwang; Y Lee; D Choi; K Kim; K Koh; S Han; K Choi; K Hwang; M Makuuchi; Y Sugawara; P Min
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Evolution of donor morbidity in living related liver transplantation: a single-center analysis of 165 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Broering; Christian Wilms; Pamela Bok; Lutz Fischer; Lars Mueller; Christian Hillert; Christian Lenk; Jong-Sun Kim; Martina Sterneck; Karl-Heinz Schulz; Gerrit Krupski; Axel Nierhaus; Detlef Ameis; Martin Burdelski; Xavier Rogiers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A comparison of cryopreserved vein allografts and prosthetic grafts for hemodialysis access.

Authors:  Robert L Madden; George S Lipkowitz; Barry J Browne; Alexander Kurbanov
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.466

7.  Donor safety and remnant liver volume in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  C Burcin Taner; Murat Dayangac; Baris Akin; Deniz Balci; Suleyman Uraz; Cihan Duran; Refik Killi; Omer Ayanoglu; Yildiray Yuzer; Yaman Tokat
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Background and clinical impact of tissue congestion in right-lobe living-donor liver grafts: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Hidekazu Yamamoto; Yoji Maetani; Tetsuya Kiuchi; Takashi Ito; Satoshi Kaihara; Hiroto Egawa; Kyo Itoh; Yasuo Kamiyama; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  A decade of right liver adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: the recipient mid-term outcomes.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan; Chung Mau Lo; Chi Leung Liu; William I Wei; Barbara Hsia-Ying Chik; John Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Live donor partial hepatectomy for liver transplantation: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  R F Saidi; N Elias; D S Ko; T Kawai; J Markmann; S Feng; A B Cosimi; M Hertl
Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.