Literature DB >> 15162061

Possible causes of chromosome instability: comparison of chromosomal abnormalities in cancer cell lines with mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHK2 and BUB1.

M Grigorova1, J M Staines, H Ozdag, C Caldas, P A W Edwards.   

Abstract

A large proportion of epithelial cancers show the chromosome-instability phenotype, in which they have many chromosome abnormalities. This is thought to be the result of mutations that disrupt chromosome maintenance, but the causative mutations are not known. We identified cell lines known to have mutations that might cause chromosome instability, and examined their karyotypes. Two cell lines, the breast cancer line HCC1937 and the pancreatic cancer line CAPAN-1, that have mutations respectively in BRCA1 and BRCA2, had very abnormal karyotypes, with many structural and numerical chromosome changes and substantial variation between metaphases. However, two colorectal cancer lines with mutations in BUB1, a spindle checkpoint protein involved in chromosome segregation, had rather simple near-tetraploid karyotypes, with minimal loss or gain of chromosomes other than the endoreduplication event, and minimal structural change. Apart from tetraploidy, these karyotypes were typical of colorectal lines considered to be chromosomally stable. Two lines derived from the same tumour, DLD-1 and HCT-15, with bi-allelic mutation of CHK2, had karyotypes that were typical of near-diploid colorectal lines considered chromosomally stable. The karyotypes observed supported the proposed role for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in chromosomal instability, but showed that the tested mutations in BUB1 and CHK2 did not result in karyotypes that would have been predicted if they were sufficient for chromosomal instability. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15162061     DOI: 10.1159/000077512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  14 in total

1.  Genome annotation by shotgun inactivation of a native gene in hemizygous cells: application to BRCA2 with implication of hypomorphic variants.

Authors:  Soma Ghosh; Anil K Bhunia; Bogdan C Paun; Samuel F Gilbert; Urmil Dhru; Kalpesh Patel; Scott E Kern
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Distinct patterns of structural and numerical chromosomal instability characterize sporadic ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; Jana Paderova; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen; Maria Zielenska; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Genomic instability and carcinogenesis: an update.

Authors:  Wael M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.236

4.  Carcinogen-altered genes in rat esophagus positively modulated to normal levels of expression by both black raspberries and phenylethyl isothiocyanate.

Authors:  Gary D Stoner; Alan A Dombkowski; Rashmeet K Reen; Daniela Cukovic; Sridevi Salagrama; Li-Shu Wang; John F Lechner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mitotic Origins of Chromosomal Instability in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  W Brian Dalton; Vincent W Yang
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2007-04

6.  A survey of cancer genome signatures identifies genes connected to distinct chromosomal instability phenotypes.

Authors:  Manar S Shafat; Eamaan S Rufaie; Johnathan Watkins
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.550

7.  Exome-wide somatic microsatellite variation is altered in cells with DNA repair deficiencies.

Authors:  Zalman Vaksman; Natalie C Fonville; Hongseok Tae; Harold R Garner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Therapeutic relevance of the protein phosphatase 2A in cancer.

Authors:  Chelsea E Cunningham; Shuangshuang Li; Frederick S Vizeacoumar; Kalpana Kalyanasundaram Bhanumathy; Joo Sang Lee; Sreejit Parameswaran; Levi Furber; Omar Abuhussein; James M Paul; Megan McDonald; Shaina D Templeton; Hersh Shukla; Amr M El Zawily; Frederick Boyd; Nezeka Alli; Darrell D Mousseau; Ron Geyer; Keith Bonham; Deborah H Anderson; Jiong Yan; Li-Yuan Yu-Lee; Beth A Weaver; Maruti Uppalapati; Eytan Ruppin; Anna Sablina; Andrew Freywald; Franco J Vizeacoumar
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  ATM and Chk2 kinase target the p53 cofactor Strap.

Authors:  Cassandra J Adams; Anne L Graham; Martin Jansson; Amanda S Coutts; Mariola Edelmann; Linda Smith; Benedikt Kessler; Nicholas B La Thangue
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Chromosomal Copy Number Variation in Saccharomyces pastorianus Is Evidence for Extensive Genome Dynamics in Industrial Lager Brewing Strains.

Authors:  M van den Broek; I Bolat; J F Nijkamp; E Ramos; M A H Luttik; F Koopman; J M Geertman; D de Ridder; J T Pronk; J-M Daran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.