Literature DB >> 15160546

Stone fragility: its therapeutic implications in shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract stones.

M S Ansari1, N P Gupta, A Seth, A K Hemal, P N Dogra, T P Singh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of stone composition on stone fragility (fragmentation) and clearance of upper urinary tract stones after shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1st July 1998 and 31st July 2001, 300 renal and ureteric units of 290 patients (10 being bilateral) underwent SWL for upper urinary tract calculi. The degree of fragmentation was divided into four types: (I) Excellent, (II) Good, (III) Fair and (IV) No fragmentation. Stone composition was done by X-ray diffraction crystallography. A statistical comparison was made between degree of fragmentation, number of shock waves delivered, voltage setting, number of sessions required and requirements of adjuvant procedures according to the stone composition.
RESULTS: Stone analysis revealed that 90% of the patients had calcium oxalate stones. Of these 80% were calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) and 20% calcium oxalate dehydrate (COD). Struvite, apatite and uric acid stones comprised of 6%, 3% and 1% respectively. Type-I fragmentation was achieved up to 63.96%, 50% and 100% in COD, struvite and uric stones respectively as compared to 44.9% and 44.44% for COM and apatite stones. Type-III fragmentation was seen up to 8.79% and 33.3% respectively in COM and apatite as compared to 5.55% or less in other types of the stones suggesting that COM and apatite stones produce larger fragments. The mean number of shock waves, voltage and number of treatments was significantly higher for COM and apatite stones (p value < 0.005) with a stone free rate of only 65-66% and 65-68% respectively at three months (p value < 0.001). Similarly the number of adjuvant procedures required in COM alone was more, i.e. 31 as compared to 17 procedures in rest of the other kinds of stones (p value < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Stone composition in Indian subcontinent is different from the western world. Fragility of a stone varies with the composition of the stone and affects the therapeutic results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15160546     DOI: 10.1023/b:urol.0000022939.61851.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

1.  [Respective role of the size, location and composition of the calculus as determinants of therapeutic success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in renal lithiasis].

Authors:  J M Ginalski; C Deslarzes; R Asper; P Jichlinski; P Jaeger
Journal:  Nephrologie       Date:  1992

2.  Gallstone fragmentation during biliary lithotripsy: effect of stone composition and structure.

Authors:  R K Zeman; T Marchand; W J Davros; B S Garra; M Glass-Royal; R D Soloway
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  [Correlation between chemical composition, density, and results of extracorporal lithotripsy in renal and ureteral lumbar calculi].

Authors:  D Bon; B Doré; J Irani; P Duverger; J Aubert
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  1992 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 0.915

4.  Stone composition is no guide to strength: changing the direction of research?

Authors:  K T Ison; M J Coptcoat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Treatment of ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. UCLA experience.

Authors:  A N Lupu; G J Fuchs; C G Chaussy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; Y I Siegel; B Steele; A W Nyhuis; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Sex- and age-related composition of 10 617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  M Daudon; R Donsimoni; C Hennequin; S Fellahi; G Le Moel; M Paris; S Troupel; B Lacour
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1995

8.  [Effects of chemical and radiographic factors on the treatment of renal lithiasis using extracorporeal external shock-wave lithotripsy].

Authors:  G Tobelem; C Economou; J Thomas; G Arvis
Journal:  Ann Urol (Paris)       Date:  1987

9.  [The chemical composition of gallstones and their suitability for litholysis and lithotripsy].

Authors:  W Swobodnik; K Kuhn; P Janowitz; H Wenk; K Teckentrup; M Classen
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1992-02-07       Impact factor: 0.628

10.  Morphology of urinary stone particles resulting from ESWL treatment.

Authors:  S R Khan; R L Hackett; B Finlayson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Imaging modalities and therapy options in patients with acute flank pain].

Authors:  A Grosse; C Grosse
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Stepwise shock wave lithotripsy: results of initial study for the treatment of urinary stones in childhood.

Authors:  Deniz Demirci; Erçin Altiok; Ibrahim Gülmez; Oğuz Ekmekçioğlu; Hakan M Poyrazoğlu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Current role of microperc in the management of small renal calculi.

Authors:  Ravindra B Sabnis; Raguram Ganesamoni; Arvind P Ganpule; Shashikant Mishra; Jigish Vyas; Jitendra Jagtap; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

5.  Effect of urine pH on the effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Ammar Al-Ani; Tawiz Gul; Hatem Kamkoum; Khalid Al-Jalham
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.