Literature DB >> 15158217

High field body MR imaging: preliminary experiences.

Hidemasa Uematsu1, Masaya Takahashi, Lawrence Dougherty, Hiroto Hatabu.   

Abstract

Whole-body magnetic resonance (MR) scanners at high field strengths (> or =3 T) have been introduced in expectation of a larger signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which would decrease the length of scan time or improve the spatial resolution. In this paper, the advantages and disadvantages of the high field MR imaging are discussed. Although the building of the radio frequency (RF) coil, safety and the specific absorption rate (SAR) are issues, the application of high field MR imaging is promising. The optimization of all parameters including injection rate of Gd-DTPA is necessary for high field MR imaging to obtain maximal results; however, we hope that high field MR imaging can be used in routine clinical applications in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15158217     DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00151-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  12 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 2.  Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential.

Authors:  Fritz Schick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Ho Kyung Chun; Woo-Yong Lee; Seong-Hyeon Yun; Sang-Yong Song; Dongil Choi; Hyo Keun Lim; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Soon Jin Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI versus gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for preoperatively detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: an initial experience.

Authors:  Yulri Park; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Yong Hwan Jeon; Jongmee Lee; Min Ju Kim; Dongil Choi; Won Jae Lee; Heejung Kim; Ji Hyun Koo; Hyo Keun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Advances in musculoskeletal MRI: technical considerations.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Monica Harish; Brian Hargreaves; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  MRI in local staging of rectal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Umit Tapan; Mustafa Ozbayrak; Servet Tatlı
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 8.  Approach to MR Imaging of the Elbow and Wrist: Technical Aspects and Innovation.

Authors:  Dustin Johnson; Kathryn J Stevens; Geoffrey Riley; Lauren Shapiro; Hiroshi Yoshioka; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T for image quality and local-regional staging.

Authors:  Y R Shin; S E Rha; B G Choi; S N Oh; M Y Park; J Y Byun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Nuts and bolts of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI.

Authors:  Guanshu Liu; Xiaolei Song; Kannie W Y Chan; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.