Literature DB >> 1515793

Relation between quality of cervical smears and probability of abnormal results.

F Buntinx1, J A Knottnerus, H F Crebolder, G G Essed, H Schouten.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1515793      PMCID: PMC1881780          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6836.1224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Relation between quality of cervical smears and probability of abnormal results.

Authors:  F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus; H F Crebolder; G G Essed; H Schouten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-09

2.  Longitudinal study of women with negative cervical smears according to endocervical status.

Authors:  H Mitchell; G Medley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-02-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  F Buntinx; M E Boon; S Beck; J A Knottnerus; G G Essed
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  Cervical cancer screening from the public health perspective.

Authors:  C Steiner
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.319

5.  The Pap smear revisited. Controversies and recent developments.

Authors:  R E Zuna
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 3.840

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Relation between quality of cervical smears and probability of abnormal results.

Authors:  F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus; H F Crebolder; G G Essed; H Schouten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-09

2.  Does feedback improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus; H F Crebolder; T Seegers; G G Essed; H Schouten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.