Literature DB >> 15154777

Using surrogate modeling in the prediction of fibrinogen adsorption onto polymer surfaces.

Jack R Smith1, Doyle Knight, Joachim Kohn, Khaled Rasheed, Norbert Weber, Vladyslav Kholodovych, William J Welsh.   

Abstract

We present a Surrogate (semiempirical) Model for prediction of protein adsorption onto the surfaces of biodegradable polymers that have been designed for tissue engineering applications. The protein used in these studies, fibrinogen, is known to play a key role in blood clotting. Therefore, fibrinogen adsorption dictates the performance of implants exposed to blood. The Surrogate Model combines molecular modeling, machine learning and an Artificial Neural Network. This novel approach includes an accounting for experimental error using a Monte Carlo analysis. Briefly, measurements of human fibrinogen adsorption were obtained for 45 polymers. A total of 106 molecular descriptors were generated for each polymer. Of these, 102 descriptors were computed using the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software based upon the polymer chemical structures, two represented different monomer types, and two were measured experimentally. The Surrogate Model was developed in two stages. In the first stage, the three descriptors with the highest correlation to adsorption were determined by calculating the information gain of each descriptor. Here a Monte Carlo approach enabled a direct assessment of the effect of the experimental uncertainty on the results. The three highest-ranking descriptors, defined as those with the highest information gain for the sample set, were then selected as the input variables for the second stage, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict fibrinogen adsorption. The ANN was trained using one-half of the experimental data set (the training set) selected at random. The effect of experimental error on predictive capability was again explored using a Monte Carlo analysis. The accuracy of the ANN was assessed by comparison of the predicted values for fibrinogen adsorption with the experimental data for the remaining polymers (the validation set). The mean value of the Pearson correlation coefficient for the validation data sets was 0.54 +/- 0.12. The average root-mean-square (relative) error in prediction for the validation data sets is 38%. This is an order of magnitude less than the range of experimental values (i.e., 366%) and compares favorably with the average percent relative standard deviation of the experimental measurements (i.e., 17.9%). The effects of each of the user-defined parameters in the ANN were explored. None were observed to have a significant effect on the results. Thus, the Surrogate Model can be used to accurately and unambiguously identify polymers whose fibrinogen absorption is at the limits of the range (i.e., low or high) which is an essential requirement for assessing polymers for regenerative tissue applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154777     DOI: 10.1021/ci0499774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci        ISSN: 0095-2338


  13 in total

1.  Logical Analysis of Data in Structure-Activity Investigation of Polymeric Gene Delivery.

Authors:  Anna V Gubskaya; Tiberius O Bonates; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Peter Hammer; William J Welsh; Robert Langer; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Macromol Theory Simul       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 1.530

2.  Screening of hyaluronic acid-poly(ethylene glycol) composite hydrogels to support intervertebral disc cell biosynthesis using artificial neural network analysis.

Authors:  Claire G Jeong; Aubrey T Francisco; Zhenbin Niu; Robert L Mancino; Stephen L Craig; Lori A Setton
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Prediction of Fibrinogen Adsorption for Biodegradable Polymers: Integration of Molecular Dynamics and Surrogate Modeling.

Authors:  Anna V Gubskaya; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Doyle Knight; Joachim Kohn; William J Welsh
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Predicting biomaterial property-dendritic cell phenotype relationships from the multivariate analysis of responses to polymethacrylates.

Authors:  Peng Meng Kou; Narayanan Pallassana; Rebeca Bowden; Barry Cunningham; Abraham Joy; Joachim Kohn; Julia E Babensee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Computational modeling of in vitro biological responses on polymethacrylate surfaces.

Authors:  Jayeeta Ghosh; Dan Y Lewitus; Prafulla Chandra; Abraham Joy; Jared Bushman; Doyle Knight; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Glass transition temperature prediction of polymers through the mass-per-flexible-bond principle.

Authors:  J Schut; D Bolikal; I Khan; A Pesnell; A Rege; R Rojas; L Sheihet; Ns Murthy; J Kohn
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Neural network analysis identifies scaffold properties necessary for in vitro chondrogenesis in elastin-like polypeptide biopolymer scaffolds.

Authors:  Dana L Nettles; Mansoor A Haider; Ashutosh Chilkoti; Lori A Setton
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  In silico design of anti-atherogenic biomaterials.

Authors:  Daniel R Lewis; Vladyslav Kholodovych; Michael D Tomasini; Dalia Abdelhamid; Latrisha K Petersen; William J Welsh; Kathryn E Uhrich; Prabhas V Moghe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Investigating the Release of a Hydrophobic Peptide from Matrices of Biodegradable Polymers: An Integrated Method Approach.

Authors:  Anna V Gubskaya; I John Khan; Loreto M Valenzuela; Yuriy V Lisnyak; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  Polymer (Guildf)       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Stepping into the omics era: Opportunities and challenges for biomaterials science and engineering.

Authors:  Nathalie Groen; Murat Guvendiren; Herschel Rabitz; William J Welsh; Joachim Kohn; Jan de Boer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.