Literature DB >> 1515444

Noninvasive methods of rejection diagnosis after heart transplantation.

B M Kemkes1, A Schütz, M Engelhardt, U Brandl, M Breuer.   

Abstract

For clinical follow-up and prognosis in heart transplant patients, it is important to understand accurately the presence and extent of cardiac allograft rejection. Since the introduction of endomyocardial biopsy, almost 40 different noninvasive diagnostic procedures for the recognition of myocardial rejection have been proposed. However, endomyocardial biopsy is invasive and not suitable for frequent monitoring. If the pattern of rejection shows a focal distribution, false-negative results can be expected. Discrepancies between biopsy findings and allograft function are obviously possible. State-of-the-art information will be given on the most reliable noninvasive methods for rejection diagnosis, which can be differentiated from electrophysiology (fast-Fourier-transformed electrocardiography and intramyocardial electrocardiography), echocardiography, immunologic methods (cytoimmunologic monitoring, transferrin receptors, and interleukin-2 receptors), various biochemical markers (neopterines, prolactin, urinary polyamines, and beta 2-microglobulins), radioisotopic techniques (antimyosin-monoclonal antibodies, thallium, technetium, and gallium scintigraphy and indium-labeled cells), as well as magnetic resonance imaging. Thus modified and patient-adapted antirejection therapy can be provided if the decision for or against antirejection therapy is not based on biopsy findings alone but rather is confirmed along with histologic, electrophysiologic, biochemical, immunologic, and functional parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1515444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  6 in total

1.  T helper frequencies in peripheral blood reflect donor-directed reactivity in the graft after clinical heart transplantation.

Authors:  L M Vaessen; C R Daane; A P Maat; A H Balk; F H Claas; W Weimar
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Intragraft interleukin 2 mRNA expression during acute cellular rejection and left ventricular total wall thickness after heart transplantation.

Authors:  H A de Groot-Kruseman; C C Baan; E M Hagman; W M Mol; H G Niesters; A P Maat; P E Zondervan; W Weimar; A H Balk
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  The challenge of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  W G Cotts; M R Johnson
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Evaluation of CXCL9 and CXCL10 as circulating biomarkers of human cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Kristjan Karason; Margareta Jernås; Daniel A Hägg; Per-Arne Svensson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Impact of animal strain on gene expression in a rat model of acute cardiac rejection.

Authors:  Katherine J Deans; Peter C Minneci; Hao Chen; Steven J Kern; Carolea Logun; Sara Alsaaty; Kelly J Norsworthy; Stephanie M Theel; Joel D Sennesh; Jennifer J Barb; Peter J Munson; Robert L Danner; Michael A Solomon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Is cytoimmunological monitoring a safe follow-up method for heart transplantation patients?

Authors:  Faruk Cingoz; Celalettin Gunay; Bilgehan Savas Oz; Mehmet Arslan
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2014-03-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.