Literature DB >> 11391041

The challenge of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

W G Cotts1, M R Johnson.   

Abstract

Since the first human heart transplantation was performed in 1967, the field of heart transplantation has advanced to the point where survival and acceptable quality of life are commonplace. Despite remarkable progress in the clinical management of rejection, rejection continues to limit survival and quality of life in the heart transplant population. This review will discuss the biologic processes involved in hyperacute rejection, acute rejection, and humoral (vascular) rejection. The development of endomyocardial biopsy techniques represented a significant advancement in the diagnosis of cardiac rejection, and endomyocardial biopsy remains the 'gold standard' in the diagnosis of cellular rejection. To date, no noninvasive parameters will diagnose rejection with adequate sensitivity and specificity. Biopsy frequency and immunosuppressive therapies may be tailored to the risk of rejection. Immunosuppression for cardiac transplantation can be divided into three major phases: 1) perioperative immunosuppression; 2) maintenance immunosuppression, and; 3) treatment of rejection. The strategy for treating transplant rejection should be influenced by several variables: 1) Histologic grade of rejection; 2) Evidence of hemodynamic compromise by ejection fraction or right heart catheterization; 3) Severity of previous rejection episodes and types of immunosuppressives used; and 4) Risk factors for rejection, including time after transplantation. Future rejection therapy will involve more sophisticated attempts to alter host responses toward the donor organ in a more specific and selective way. Despite considerable advances in the care of the heart transplant recipient, long-term survival is limited by cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The final section of this chapter will review the pathology, immunopathology, nonimmunologic risk factors, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of allograft vasculopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11391041     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011414307636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  90 in total

1.  Heart transplant rejection with hemodynamic compromise: a multiinstitutional study of the role of endomyocardial cellular infiltrate. Cardiac Transplant Research Database.

Authors:  R M Mills; D C Naftel; J K Kirklin; A B Van Bakel; B E Jaski; E K Massin; H J Eisen; F A Lee; D P Fishbein; R C Bourge
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  Can we assess the changes of ventricular filling resulting from acute allograft rejection with Doppler echocardiography?

Authors:  T Forster; J McGhie; H Rijsterborgh; S van de Borden; K Laird-Meeter; A Balk; C Essed; J Roelandt
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec

3.  Acute vascular rejection involving the major coronary arteries of a cardiac allograft.

Authors:  R L Yowell; E H Hammond; M R Bristow; F S Watson; D G Renlund; J B O'Connell
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1988 May-Jun

4.  Crystal structures of human calcineurin and the human FKBP12-FK506-calcineurin complex.

Authors:  C R Kissinger; H E Parge; D R Knighton; C T Lewis; L A Pelletier; A Tempczyk; V J Kalish; K D Tucker; R E Showalter; E W Moomaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Human coronary transplantation-associated arteriosclerosis. Evidence for a chronic immune reaction to activated graft endothelial cells.

Authors:  R N Salomon; C C Hughes; F J Schoen; D D Payne; J S Pober; P Libby
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Single-center randomized trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in the prevention of acute myocardial rejection.

Authors:  B M Meiser; P Uberfuhr; A Fuchs; D Schmidt; M Pfeiffer; D Paulus; C Schulze; S Wildhirt; W V Scheidt; C Angermann; V Klauss; S Martin; H Reichenspurner; E Kreuzer; B Reichart
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current concepts, recent developments, and future directions.

Authors:  J D Hosenpud; G D Shipley; C R Wagner
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Successful coronary artery bypass grafting for high-risk left main coronary artery atherosclerosis after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  J G Copeland; S M Butman; G Sethi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Does short-course induction with OKT3 improve outcome after heart transplantation? A randomized trial.

Authors:  J A Kobashigawa; L W Stevenson; E Brownfield; J D Moriguchi; N Kawata; M Hamilton; R Minkely; D Drinkwater; H Laks
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Methotrexate for the treatment of patients with multiple episodes of acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  J D Hosenpud; R E Hershberger; R R Ratkovec; H Hovaguimian; G Ott; A Cobanoglu; D Norman
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The complex role of iNOS in acutely rejecting cardiac transplants.

Authors:  Galen M Pieper; Allan M Roza
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Rejection of cardiac xenografts transplanted from alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GalT-KO) pigs to baboons.

Authors:  Y Hisashi; K Yamada; K Kuwaki; Y-L Tseng; F J M F Dor; S L Houser; S C Robson; H-J Schuurman; D K C Cooper; D H Sachs; R B Colvin; A Shimizu
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Nitric oxide synthases in heart failure.

Authors:  Ricardo Carnicer; Mark J Crabtree; Vidhya Sivakumaran; Barbara Casadei; David A Kass
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 8.401

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.