Literature DB >> 15152822

Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling.

Gary A Hartman1, David L Cochran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to predict the amount of bone remodeling around implants is important for a stable and predictable esthetic result. The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of radiographic bone remodeling that occurs over time using a one-piece implant system.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients receiving implants in the maxilla and 15 receiving implants in the mandible were included in the study. All implants were placed with a non-submerged surgical technique with varying locations of the rough-smooth border with respect to the alveolar crest. Clinical exams and radiographs were taken on the day of implant placement, at 6 months, and annually up to 5 years. Linear measurements from digitized radiographs were made from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact at all time points.
RESULTS: A significant amount of bone remodeling compared to baseline occurred for all implants at the 6-month follow-up visit (1.10 mm), with the remaining time points showing virtually no change (0.1 mm). A relationship was found between the amount of bone remodeling and the location of the rough-smooth border with respect to the alveolar crest. Those implants with the rough-smooth border surgically placed below the crest had, on average, a greater amount of remodeling at 6 months (average 1.72 mm) than implants with the rough-smooth border placed at or near the crest (average 0.68 mm). In both situations, this remodeling: 1) occurred early (within 6 months), 2) reached a similar level, and 3) remained virtually unchanged up through 60 months (0.05 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: A physiologic dimension appears to exist between the bone and the implant-crown interface around one-piece implants that is established early and maintained over time. These results are significant because they demonstrate in patients that the magnitude of initial bone remodeling around these one-piece dental implants is dependent on the positioning of the rough-smooth border of the implant in an apico-coronal dimension. Furthermore, the dimension, from the crown-implant interface to the first bone-to-implant contact, is consistent with the formation of a biologic width similar to that found around the natural dentition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15152822     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  13 in total

1.  Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of longitudinal bone density changes around immediate loading implants: a pilot study.

Authors:  L S Carneiro; H A da Cunha; C R Leles; E F Mendonça
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Alessandra Lucchese; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-02-19

3.  What is the effect of initial implant position on the crestal bone level in flap and flapless technique during healing period?

Authors:  Mohammed Jasim Al-Juboori; Shaifulizan Ab Rahman; Akram Hassan; Ikmal Hisham Bin Ismail; Omar Farouq Tawfiq
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 5.  Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Mohamed Keshk; Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi; Radhwan S Algabri; Mostafa S Swedan; Amal Kaddah
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  Bone-level implants placed in the anterior maxilla: an open-label, single-arm observational study.

Authors:  EnFeng Gao; Wei-Hong Hei; Jong-Chul Park; KangMi Pang; Sun Kyung Kim; Bongju Kim; Soung-Min Kim; Jong-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Clinical Outcomes of Root-Analogue Implants Restored with Single Crowns or Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Mats Wernfried Heinrich Böse; Detlef Hildebrand; Florian Beuer; Christian Wesemann; Paul Schwerdtner; Stefano Pieralli; Benedikt Christopher Spies
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Peri-implant crestal bone loss: a putative mechanism.

Authors:  Yuko Ujiie; Reynaldo Todescan; John E Davies
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-02

Review 9.  Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Andrea Hegewald; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Retrospective long-term analysis of bone level changes after horizontal alveolar crest reconstruction with autologous bone grafts harvested from the posterior region of the mandible.

Authors:  Jan Oliver Voss; Tobias Dieke; Christian Doll; Claudia Sachse; Katja Nelson; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Susanne Nahles
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.