OBJECTIVE: Joint drug formularies and treatment guidelines have been developed to reduce problems arising at the interface between primary and secondary care. The aim is to compare the willingness of hospital specialists and general practitioners to use joint treatment guidelines, and to determine the most relevant barriers and facilitators. STUDY DESIGN: A structured survey, consisting of questions about the use of guidelines and formularies in general, and possible barriers and facilitators for using a specific joint guideline. These specific guidelines concerned the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, or diabetes mellitus. SETTING AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-seven general practitioners and 34 general internists and cardiologists from the north of the Netherlands. RESULTS: Most hospital specialists relied for their prescribing on international guidelines and agreements within their own department, while general practitioners relied more on national and regional guidelines. General practitioners were more supportive than specialists of the initiative to develop joint treatment guidelines, although both groups had concerns regarding the development process. An important barrier for specialists was that they did not perceive a need for these guidelines. As enabling factors, physicians stated that these joint guidelines can lead to harmonization between specialists and general practitioners, and that they can be useful as an educational tool. CONCLUSION: Specialists are less ready to adopt joint treatment guidelines than general practitioners, indicating the need for a different approach to implement such guidelines in the two sectors.
OBJECTIVE: Joint drug formularies and treatment guidelines have been developed to reduce problems arising at the interface between primary and secondary care. The aim is to compare the willingness of hospital specialists and general practitioners to use joint treatment guidelines, and to determine the most relevant barriers and facilitators. STUDY DESIGN: A structured survey, consisting of questions about the use of guidelines and formularies in general, and possible barriers and facilitators for using a specific joint guideline. These specific guidelines concerned the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, or diabetes mellitus. SETTING AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-seven general practitioners and 34 general internists and cardiologists from the north of the Netherlands. RESULTS: Most hospital specialists relied for their prescribing on international guidelines and agreements within their own department, while general practitioners relied more on national and regional guidelines. General practitioners were more supportive than specialists of the initiative to develop joint treatment guidelines, although both groups had concerns regarding the development process. An important barrier for specialists was that they did not perceive a need for these guidelines. As enabling factors, physicians stated that these joint guidelines can lead to harmonization between specialists and general practitioners, and that they can be useful as an educational tool. CONCLUSION: Specialists are less ready to adopt joint treatment guidelines than general practitioners, indicating the need for a different approach to implement such guidelines in the two sectors.
Authors: C L Gregson; E M Dennison; J E Compston; S Adami; J D Adachi; F A Anderson; S Boonen; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; S L Greenspan; F H Hooven; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; E S Siris; N B Watts; A Wyman; C Cooper Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ulrich Tebbe; Carsten Tschöpe; Jost Henner Wirtz; Jan Lokies; Eva Turgonyi; Peter Bramlage; Anke M Strunz; Katharina Lins; Michael Böhm Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Annette J Berendsen; Wim H G M Benneker; Jan Schuling; Nienke Rijkers-Koorn; Joris P J Slaets; Betty Meyboom-de Jong Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Annette J Berendsen; Wim H G M Benneker; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Niek S Klazinga; Jan Schuling Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marjolein Lugtenberg; Judith M Zegers-van Schaick; Gert P Westert; Jako S Burgers Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 7.327