Literature DB >> 15148594

Finite helical axes of motion are a useful tool to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine.

A Kettler1, F Marin, G Sattelmayer, M Mohr, H Mannel, L Dürselen, L Claes, H J Wilke.   

Abstract

The finite helical-axes method can be used to describe the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the spine. However, this method still suffers from large stochastic calculation errors and poorly conceived visualisation techniques. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to improve the currently used finite helical axes description, by use of a less error-prone calculation algorithm and a new visualisation technique, and to apply this improved method to the study of the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the spine. Three-dimensional, continuous motion data of spinal motion segments were used to calculate the position and orientation of the finite helical axes (FHAs). The axes were then projected on plane antero-posterior, lateral and axial radiographs in order to depict the relation to the anatomy of each individual specimen. A hinge joint was used to estimate the measurement error of data collection and axes calculation. In an exemplary in vitro experiment, this method was used to demonstrate the ability of a prosthetic disc nucleus to restore the three-dimensional motion pattern of lumbar motion segments. In the validation experiment with the hinge joint, the calculated FHAs were lying within +/-2.5 mm of the actual joint axis and were inclined relative to this axis at up to +/-1.5 degrees . In the exemplary in vitro experiment, the position and orientation of the FHAs of the intact specimens were subject to large inter-individual differences in all loading directions. Nucleotomy of the lumbar segments caused the axes to spread out, indicating complex coupled motions. The implantation of the prosthetic disc nucleus, for the most part, more than reversed this effect: the axes became oriented almost parallel to each other. The experiments showed that the present improved description of finite helical axes is a valid and useful tool to characterise the three-dimensional in vitro kinematics of the intact, injured and stabilised spine. The main advantage of this new method is the comprehensive visualisation of joint function with respect to the individual anatomy.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15148594      PMCID: PMC3476597          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0710-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

Review 1.  A review of analytical techniques for gait data. Part 2: neural network and wavelet methods.

Authors:  T Chau
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Animation of in vitro biomechanical tests.

Authors:  P A Cripton; M Sati; T E Orr; Y Bourquin; G A Dumas; L P Nolte
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Sorin Siegler; Paul Allard; Chris Kirtley; Alberto Leardini; Dieter Rosenbaum; Mike Whittle; Darryl D D'Lima; Luca Cristofolini; Hartmut Witte; Oskar Schmid; Ian Stokes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A sequence of two rotations--50 degrees torso flexion followed by +/-120 degrees of head axial rotation--was monitored using (essentially) goniometers and simultaneously measured by Euler XZY an YZX decompositions of marker data from an electromagnetic system (Flock of Birds).

Authors:  Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Correction of axis misalignment in the analysis of knee rotations.

Authors:  F Marin; H Mannel; L Claes; L Dürselen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates.

Authors:  F E Veldpaus; H J Woltring; L J Dortmans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A mathematical approach for three-dimensional analysis of the mechanics of the spine.

Authors:  M Panjabi; A A White
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics.

Authors:  H J Woltring; R Huiskes; A de Lange; F E Veldpaus
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A technique for measurement and description of three-dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with an application to the human spine.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; M H Krag; V K Goel
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Justification of triaxial goniometer for the measurement of joint rotation.

Authors:  E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  8 in total

1.  Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Qingan Zhu; Eyal Itshayek; Claire F Jones; Timothy Schwab; Chadwick R Larson; Lawrence G Lenke; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Letter to the Editor concerning "A hypothesis of chronic back pain: ligament subfailure injuries lead to muscle control dysfunction" (M. Panjabi).

Authors:  Robert Schleip; Andry Vleeming; Frank Lehmann-Horn; Werner Klingler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Shaobai Wang; Peter Passias; Qun Xia; Gang Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: implication to lumbar pathology and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; Sean J Driscoll; Thomas D Cha; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical and statistical correlation of various lumbar pathological conditions.

Authors:  J Michael Johnson; Mohamed Mahfouz; Nicholas V Battaglia; Adrija Sharma; Joseph S Cheng; Richard D Komistek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  3D kinematic characteristics of lumbar facet joints in sitting position.

Authors:  Ye Han; Kepeng Li; Xiaodong Wang; Jianzhong Wang; Shaosong Sun; Xi Xia; Jing Wang; Jun Miao
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 1.354

7.  Altered helical axis patterns of the lumbar spine indicate increased instability with disc degeneration.

Authors:  Arin M Ellingson; David J Nuckley
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A compliant-mechanism approach to achieving specific quality of motion in a lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Peter A Halverson; Anton E Bowden; Larry L Howell
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.