Literature DB >> 15147749

Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography.

R Dumas1, A Le Bras, N Champain, M Savidan, D Mitton, G Kalifa, J-P Steib, J A de Guise, W Skalli.   

Abstract

The three dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the spine can be obtained by stereoradiographic techniques. To be safely used on a routine clinics basis, stereoradiography must provide both accurate vertebral shape and coherent position. Although the accuracy of the reconstructed morphology of the vertebrae is well documented, only few authors studied the accuracy of the vertebral orientation. Therefore, this paper focuses on the evaluation of the orientation accuracy of the reconstructed vertebrae (obtained by non-stereo corresponding point technique) considering either a 178 point vertebral model or a 6 point vertebral model (previously proposed in the literature). Five dried vertebrae were fixed on holders containing four markers each. The 3D reconstruction of both vertebrae and markers were obtained by stereoradiographic techniques. Using least square method matching from one position to another, the relative orientation was computed for the vertebral models (6 or 178 points) and the four markers. These vertebral and holder orientations were compared (considering the holder's one as reference). The repeatability of these relative orientations (vertebrae and holders) was also evaluated. The mean (RMS) orientation error of 178 point vertebral model was 0.6 degrees (0.8 degrees ), for lateral rotation, 0.7 degrees (1.0 degrees ) for sagittal rotation and 1.4 degrees (1.9 degrees ) for axial rotation. The intra-observer repeatability was 0.5 degrees (0.7 degrees ) for lateral rotation, 0.7 degrees (0.8 degrees ) for sagittal rotation and 0.9 degrees (1.2 degrees ) for axial rotation. The orientation was found more accurate and precise when using the 178 point vertebral model than when using the basic 6 point vertebral model. The relative orientation (in post-operative follow-up with respect to the pre-operative examination) of the vertebrae of one scoliotic patient was performed as an example of clinical application. The stereoradiographic method is a reliable 3D quantitative tool to assess the spine deformity, that can be used in clinics for the follow-up of scoliotic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15147749     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  Fast 3D reconstruction of the rib cage from biplanar radiographs.

Authors:  E Jolivet; B Sandoz; S Laporte; D Mitton; W Skalli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A semi-automated method using interpolation and optimisation for the 3D reconstruction of the spine from bi-planar radiography: a precision and accuracy study.

Authors:  Raphaël Dumas; Bertrand Blanchard; Robert Carlier; Christian Garreau de Loubresse; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Catherine Marty; Maryse Moinard; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of axial vertebral rotation.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Prediction equations for human thoracic and lumbar vertebral morphometry.

Authors:  Maria E Kunkel; Hendrik Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for Automatic Reconstruction of the 3D Spine Structure by Using Simulated Bi-Planar X-ray Images.

Authors:  Ching-Juei Yang; Cheng-Li Lin; Chien-Kuo Wang; Jing-Yao Wang; Chih-Chia Chen; Fong-Chin Su; Yin-Ju Lee; Chun-Chung Lui; Lee-Ren Yeh; Yu-Hua Dean Fang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30

6.  Three-dimensional assessment of the intervertebral kinematics after Mobi-C total disc replacement at the cervical spine in vivo using the EOS stereoradiography system.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Sébastien Laporte; Thierry Dufour; Jean-Paul Steib; Jean-Yves Lazennec; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

7.  3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: Inter-reader reproducibility and reliability.

Authors:  Johannes Rehm; Thomas Germann; Michael Akbar; Wojciech Pepke; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Marc-André Weber; Daniel Spira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.