Literature DB >> 15147428

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus improves quality-of-life indices, renal graft function and cardiovascular risk profile.

Marika A Artz1, Johannes M M Boots, Gerry Ligtenberg, Joke I Roodnat, Maarten H L Christiaans, Pieter F Vos, Philip Moons, George Borm, Luuk B Hilbrands.   

Abstract

Long-term use of cyclosporine after renal transplantation results in nephrotoxicity and an increased cardiovascular risk profile. Tacrolimus may be more favorable in this respect. In this randomized controlled study in 124 renal transplant patients, the effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on renal function, cardiovascular risk factors, and perceived side-effects were investigated after a follow-up of 2 years. After conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus renal function remained stable, whereas continuation of cyclosporine was accompanied by a rise in serum creatinine from 142 +/- 48 micromol/L to 157 +/- 62 micromol/L (p < 0.05 comparing both groups). Conversion to tacrolimus resulted in a sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a sustained improvement in the serum lipid profile, leading to a reduction in the Framingham risk score from 5.7 +/- 4.3 to 4.8 +/- 5.3 (p < 0.05). Finally, conversion to tacrolimus resulted in decreased scores for occurrence of and distress due to side-effects. In conclusion, conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant patients is beneficial with respect to renal function, cardiovascular risk profile, and side-effects. Therefore, for most renal transplant patients tacrolimus will be the drug of choice when long-term treatment with a calcineurin inhibitor is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15147428     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00427.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  22 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Evaluation of Modified Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations.

Authors:  Simon Tremblay; Rita R Alloway
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Krishna M Karpe; Girish S Talaulikar; Giles D Walters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-21

3.  Potential cardiovascular risk factors in paediatric renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jorge R Ferraris; Lidia Ghezzi; Gabriel Waisman; Rafael T Krmar
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Quality of life of older patients undergoing renal transplantation: finding the right immunosuppressive treatment.

Authors:  Rachel L Perlman; Panduranga S Rao
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

Review 6.  Effect of immunosuppressive agents on long-term survival of renal transplant recipients: focus on the cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Johannes M M Boots; Maarten H L Christiaans; Johannes P van Hooff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Dyslipidemia following kidney transplantation: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Stéphanie Badiou; Jean-Paul Cristol; Georges Mourad
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplantation: impact on patient survival, and incidence of cardiovascular disease, malignancy and infection.

Authors:  Roberto Marcén
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Controversies in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Meryl Waldman; Howard A Austin
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Cardiovascular outcomes in the outpatient kidney transplant clinic: the Framingham risk score revisited.

Authors:  Bryce Kiberd; Romuald Panek
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.