Literature DB >> 15146312

Normal and transplanted lateral knee menisci: evaluation of extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound.

Peter Verdonk1, Yves Depaepe, Stefan Desmyter, Martine De Muynck, Karl Fredrik Almqvist, Koenraad Verstraete, René Verdonk.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to develop a clinically useful and reproducible method for evaluating lateral meniscal extrusion in normal and transplanted knees under different axial loading conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) were used to assess meniscal extrusion. Both types of imaging were performed at least 6 months postoperatively (mean 23.5 months). Coronal MR images (DESS-3D sequence) of the lateral compartments of 10 normal knees and 17 transplanted lateral knees were analyzed. Extrusion was defined as the distance measured from the femoral condyle or tibial plateau to the outer edge of the meniscus. Subjects were examined in the supine position. Ultrasound print-outs of the lateral compartment of both knees of ten patients (transplanted side and contralateral normal side) were analyzed. Extrusion cross-sectional area (CSA) and distance were measured just anterior to the lateral collateral ligament: the former was defined as the CSA of the meniscus outside the knee, the latter as the greatest distance from a line connecting the femur and tibia to the outer edge of the lateral meniscus. Patients were examined in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance. The viable meniscal allograft was securely sutured to a bleeding functional meniscal rim. No bone blocks were used to fix the allograft; instead, the anterior and posterior horn were firmly sutured to their enthesis. The MRI results (tibial) show the transplanted lateral meniscus to be significantly (p<0.005) more extruded in comparison to the normal lateral meniscus. The anterior horn (mean 5.8 mm, SD=2.8) of the transplanted lateral meniscus tends to be more extruded than the posterior horn (mean 2.7 mm, SD=1.48). The posterior horn of the normal lateral meniscus does not (mean 0 mm) extrude, while the mean extrusion of the anterior horn is 0.8 mm (SD=0.92). In the US results, the transplanted lateral meniscus is significantly (p<0.005) more extruded than the normal lateral meniscus in all patient positions. Both cross-sectional surface and distance are equally good parameters to determine meniscal extrusion. There is no statistical difference between patient positions. The transplanted lateral meniscus extrudes, in the supine position, bipodal and unipodal stance 6.43 (SD=1.84), 6.01 (SD=1.93) and 6.99 mm (SD=2.7) respectively. The extrusion surface of the lateral transplanted meniscus is 50.50 mm2 (SD=15.32), 47.24 mm2 (SD=14.35) and 58.61 mm2 (SD=29.65) in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance respectively. The normal lateral meniscus extrudes in the supine position, bipodal and unipodal stance 3.77 (SD=1.76), 3.94 (SD=1.66) and 3.79 mm (SD=1.79) respectively. The extrusion surface of the normal lateral meniscus is 22.42 mm2 (SD=12.54), 23.24 mm2 (SD=12.74) and 24.79 mm2 (SD=10.18) in the supine position, bipodal stance and unipodal stance respectively. The presented data shows that the transplanted lateral meniscus, without bone block fixation but with firm fixation of the horns to the original entheses, extrudes in the lateral direction significantly more than the normal meniscus. The transplanted lateral meniscus, however, does not extrude more in the lateral direction under axial load. The anterior horn of both normal and transplanted menisci is extruded more laterally than the posterior horn. Both methods are adequate to measure laterally-directed extrusion of the normal and transplanted lateral meniscus, but have distinctive advantages and disadvantages: MRI in this series visualizes the complete-from posterior to anterior-meniscal body, but only in the supine, non-weight-bearing position. Using ultrasound one can evaluate the meniscal extrusion in different conditions of axial loading, but only from a single examination point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15146312     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0500-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  16 in total

1.  Meniscal subluxation: association with osteoarthritis and joint space narrowing.

Authors:  D R Gale; C E Chaisson; S M Totterman; R K Schwartz; M E Gale; D Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  How three methods for fixing a medial meniscal autograft affect tibial contact mechanics.

Authors:  M M Alhalki; S M Howell; M L Hull
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Meniscus repair.

Authors:  K E DeHaven
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The level of compressive load affects conclusions from statistical analyses to determine whether a lateral meniscal autograft restores tibial contact pressure to normal: a study in human cadaveric knees.

Authors:  Arthur Huang; M L Hull; Stephen M Howell
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  The current state of meniscal allograft transplantation and replacement.

Authors:  Gabriela Peters; Carl Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Knee joint changes after meniscectomy.

Authors:  T J FAIRBANK
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1948-11

7.  Alternative treatments for meniscal injuries.

Authors:  R Verdonk
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-09

8.  Long-term results of meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Carl Joachim Wirth; Gabriela Peters; Klaus A Milachowski; Karl G Weismeier; Dieter Kohn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  [Viable meniscus transplantation].

Authors:  R Verdonk; P Van Daele; B Claus; K Vandenabeele; P Desmet; G Verbruggen; E M Veys; H Claessens
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Survival analysis of human meniscal transplantations.

Authors:  E R A van Arkel; H H de Boer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-03
View more
  31 in total

1.  Width is a more important predictor in graft extrusion than length using plain radiographic sizing in lateral meniscal transplantation.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Jong-Won Chung; Jong-Min Kim; Kyung-Ah Kim; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Factors affecting meniscal extrusion: correlation with MRI, clinical, and arthroscopic findings.

Authors:  Lluís Puig; Joan C Monllau; Mónica Corrales; Xavier Pelfort; Elena Melendo; Enric Cáceres
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The effects of lateral meniscal allograft transplantation techniques on tibio-femoral contact pressures.

Authors:  Ian D McDermott; Denny T T Lie; Andrew Edwards; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Biomechanics of the meniscus-meniscal ligament construct of the knee.

Authors:  S D Masouros; I D McDermott; A A Amis; A M J Bull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Meniscal allograft transplantation. Part 1: systematic review of graft biology, graft shrinkage, graft extrusion, graft sizing, and graft fixation.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Dean C Taylor; Brian Rill; Terrence Lock; Vasilius Moutzouros; Patricia Kolowich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Lateral Capsular Fixation: An Implant-Free Technique to Prevent Meniscal Allograft Extrusion.

Authors:  Joan C Monllau; Maximiliano Ibañez; Angel Masferrer-Pino; Pablo E Gelber; Juan I Erquicia; Xavier Pelfort
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-03-06

7.  Meniscal allograft subluxations are not associated with preoperative native meniscal subluxations.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Jae Hyan Kim; Eic Ju Lim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Safety, Feasibility, and Radiographic Outcomes of the Anterior Meniscal Takedown Technique to Approach Chondral Defects on the Tibia and Posterior Femoral Condyle: A Matched Control Study.

Authors:  Gergo Merkely; Tom Minas; Takahiro Ogura; Jakob Ackermann; Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Meniscal extrusion is positively correlated with the anatomical position changes of the meniscal anterior and posterior horns, following medial meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Nam-Ki Kim; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Bum-Sik Lee; Chang-Rack Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Arthroscopic meniscal allograft transplantation with two tibia tunnels without bone plugs: evaluation of healing on MR arthrography and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Thibaut Roumazeille; Shahnaz Klouche; Benoit Rousselin; Vito Bongiorno; Nicolas Graveleau; Nicolas Billot; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.