Literature DB >> 15145486

Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

John Damilakis1, George Papadokostakis, Kostas Perisinakis, Thomas Maris, P Dimitriou, Alexander Hadjipavlou, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the ability of different techniques used for the assessment of bone status to discriminate between postmenopausal women with and without hip fracture. Fifty-one postmenopausal women (mean age 64.5 +/- 6.5) who had sustained a low energy hip fracture and 51 age-matched controls (mean age 64.6 +/- 6.0) were studied. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) assessment was carried out using the Ubis 3000 device capable of measuring broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound at the calcaneus (SOSC) and the Sunlight Omnisense device capable of estimating speed of sound at the phalanges (SOSP). Femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Correlations between QUS variables ranged from r = 0.35 to 0.72 and between QUS variables and BMD from r = 0.30 to 0.36. BMD was the best discriminator of hip fractures (odds ratio = 3.61, area under curve = 0.824). All QUS variables were significant discriminators of hip fractures with odds ratios ranging from 1.88 to 2.63 and areas under the ROC curves ranging from 0.663 to 0.740. Among the QUS variables, the SOSP showed the best odds ratio and area under curve. Comparison between the areas under the ROC curve did not show any significant difference between SOSP, BUA and BMD. On the contrary, the difference between SOSC and BMD was significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, BMD and QUS variables investigated in the current study were significant discriminators of hip fractures. The differentiation of the hip fractures by BMD was significantly better than that of BUA measured at the calcaneus. Moreover, BMD discriminated fractured patients better than BUA and SOS(P), although the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145486     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

1.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; George Ioannidis; Kenneth S Davison
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.

Authors:  J P Karjalainen; O Riekkinen; J Töyräs; J S Jurvelin; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.507

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.