Literature DB >> 15145484

Assessment of the skeletal status by MR relaxometry techniques of the lumbar spine: comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Thomas G Maris1, John Damilakis, Liana Sideri, Michael Deimling, Georgios Papadokostakis, Olympia Papakonstantinou, Nikos Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure lumbar spine T2*, T2, T2' and T1 MR relaxometry parameters and compare them with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of postmenopausal women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar spine T2*, T2, T2' and T1 MR relaxometry parameters and BMD values were assessed in 101 postmenopausal women (mean age: 61.8 +/- 7.1 (1 S.D.) years); of them 63 referred to as control subjects (group A, BMD T-scores > or = -2.5 S.D.) and 38 as osteoporotic (group B, BMD T-scores < -2.5 S.D.). All magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed on an 1.5 T imaging system using: (a) a 2D single slice multi echo (32 echoes) gradient echo (MEGRE) sequence (TR/TE1/TE32/FA: 160/2.7/74.93 ms/25 degrees for the T2* measurement, (b) a respiratory gated 2D single slice Multi Echo (16 echoes) Spin Echo (MESE) sequence (TR/TE1/TE16/FA: 2000-2500/22.5/360 ms/90 degrees) for the T2 measurement and (c) a 2D single slice multi TI (18 repeats) turbo Fast Low Angle Shot (turbo FLASH) sequence (TR/TE/TI1/TI16/FA: 11/4.2/10/5000 ms/10 degrees) for the T1 measurement. T2' was calculated from its definition equation: (1/T2' = 1/T2* - 1/T2). Lumbar spine BMD was assessed using DXA.
RESULTS: All measured parameters showed statistically significant differences between groups A and B (from P < 0.05 to <0.001). All parameters showed significant associations with subject's age ranging from r = 0.245 (P < 0.05) for the T2 up to r = 0.377 (P < 0.001) for the T2*. All parameters showed significant associations with subject's BMD measurements ranging from r = -0.184 (P < 0.05) for the R1 = (1/T1) up to r = -0.345 (P < 0.0005) for the T2.
CONCLUSION: Among the MR relaxometry parameters studied, T2* and T2 showed better discrimination of patients with osteoporosis from control subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15145484     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

Review 1.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Compositional evaluation of lesion and parent bone in patients with juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the knee using T2 * mapping.

Authors:  Štefan Zbýň; Cassiano Santiago; Casey P Johnson; Kai D Ludwig; Lin Zhang; Shelly Marette; Marc A Tompkins; Bradley J Nelson; Takashi Takahashi; Gregory J Metzger; Cathy S Carlson; Jutta M Ellermann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.102

3.  Longitudinal 3T MRI T2 * mapping of Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) lesions differentiates operative from non-operative patients-Pilot study.

Authors:  Abdul Wahed Kajabi; Štefan Zbýň; Casey P Johnson; Marc A Tompkins; Bradley J Nelson; Takashi Takahashi; Kevin G Shea; Shelly Marette; Cathy S Carlson; Jutta M Ellermann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Proton-density fat fraction and simultaneous R2* estimation as an MRI tool for assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Diego Hernando; Peter J Meffert; Scott Reeder; Norbert Hosten; Rene Laqua; Antje Steveling; Stephan Ender; Henry Schröder; Dirk-Thomas Pillich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Monitoring of Cellular Changes in the Bone Marrow following PTH(1-34) Treatment of OVX Rats Using a Portable Stray-Field NMR Scanner.

Authors:  Inbar Hillel; Itzhak Binderman; Yifat Sarda; Uri Nevo
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2017-05-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.