Literature DB >> 15144242

Early oral feeding after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled study.

Carlo V Feo1, Barbara Romanini, Davide Sortini, Riccardo Ragazzi, Paolo Zamboni, Gian C Pansini, Alberto Liboni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric (NG) intubation is widely used following elective abdominal operations although it is associated with morbidity and discomfort. The present study is a randomised controlled trial on the effect of early oral feeding without NG decompression following elective colorectal resection for cancer.
METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized to group A (NG catheter and fasting until passage of flatus, followed by liquid diet advanced to soft-solid) or group B (no NG tube, clear liquids the day after surgery, followed by soft-solid food). The endpoints were: (i) morbidity; (ii) resumption of intestinal function; (iii) length of hospital stay; and (iv) patients' well being evaluated by short-form health survey [36 items] (SF-36).
RESULTS: Twelve complications occurred in group A (50 patients) and 13 in group B (50 patients) (P = NS). Seven patients developed vomiting in group A as compared to 16 in group B (P < 0.05). Twenty per cent of patients required NG decompression in group B hence 80% did not need NG tubes. Resumption of intestinal function occurred after 4 days, and length of hospital stay was 7 days in both groups. No significant difference was detected between groups (P = NS) in the SF-36 score change before and after the operation.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection can be managed without postoperative NG catheters, starting oral feeding on the first postoperative day. Albeit, no reduction in postoperative hospital stay or patients' well being could be detected, abolition of postoperative NG intubation with early oral feeding was a safe approach, with only 20% of patients requiring NG decompression because of repeated episodes of vomiting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15144242     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.02985.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  28 in total

Review 1.  Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kiyoko Ebisawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma Osland; Rossita Yunus; Shahjahan Khan; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ping Li; Fang Fang; Jia-Xun Cai; Dong Tang; Qing-Guo Li; Dao-Rong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Zhi-Wei Jiang; Jing Xu; Jian-Feng Gong; Yang Bao; Li-Fei Xie; Jie-Shou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Safety of fast-track rehabilitation after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liu-Hua Wang; Fang Fang; Chun-Ming Lu; Dao-Rong Wang; Ping Li; Ping Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?

Authors:  Chiara Bianchini; Stefano Pelucchi; Antonio Pastore; Carlo V Feo; Andrea Ciorba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Early oral feeding versus traditional postoperative care after abdominal emergency surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roberto F Klappenbach; Federico J Yazyi; Facundo Alonso Quintas; Matías E Horna; Juan Alvarez Rodríguez; Alejandro Oría
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Implementation of an ERAS Pathway in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Paul Cavallaro; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

10.  Randomized Controlled Trial for Evaluation of the Routine Use of Nasogastric Tube Decompression After Elective Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ichida; Hiroshi Imamura; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroyuki Sugo; Yoichi Ishizaki; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.