Literature DB >> 15138141

Force and timing components of the motor program.

R B Ivry1.   

Abstract

Three experiments were undertaken to assess the effects of variations of force and time on both simple and choice reaction time. The first two experiments demonstrated that although latency did not vary as a function of force, timing variations, such as requiring that a response be maintained, led to consistent changes in reaction time. These results led to the development of a model of motor programming in which force and timing are dissociated as separate components. However, the data also indicated that the force component may be further analyzed into two subcomponents-force activation and force deactivation. The model predicts that the latter subcomponent may be programmed on-line provided that sufficient time elapses between the implementation of the two subcomponents. A different pair of movements was used in Experiment 3 to further demonstrate that force activation and deactivation may be preprogrammed into a single component. These results support the aspect of the proposed model that makes a distinction between operations required for program construction from those necessary for program implementation.

Year:  1986        PMID: 15138141     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1986.10735390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  7 in total

1.  Temporal response-effect compatibility.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

2.  The effects of changing movement velocity and complexity on response preparation: evidence from latency, kinematic, and EMG measures.

Authors:  P van Donkelaar; I M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Timing and visual feedback constraints on repetitive finger force production.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effect of temporal and force changes on the patterning of sequential movements.

Authors:  J P Piek; D J Glencross; N C Barrett; G L Love
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

Review 5.  Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Thomas R Reppert; Erik M Summerside; Tehrim Yoon; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Movement vigor as a traitlike attribute of individuality.

Authors:  Thomas R Reppert; Ioannis Rigas; David J Herzfeld; Ehsan Sedaghat-Nejad; Oleg Komogortsev; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perceived effort affects choice of limb and reaction time of movements.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Peter S Lum; Reza Shadmehr; Sang Wook Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.