Literature DB >> 15137066

Site-matched papillary and reticular human dermal fibroblasts differ in their release of specific growth factors/cytokines and in their interaction with keratinocytes.

J Michael Sorrell1, M A Baber, A I Caplan.   

Abstract

The interfollicular dermis of adult human skin is partitioned into histologically and physiologically distinct papillary and reticular zones. Each of these zones contains a unique population of fibroblasts that differ in respect to their proliferation kinetics, rates at which they contract type I collagen gels, and in their relative production of decorin and versican. Here, site-matched papillary and reticular dermal fibroblasts couples were compared to determine whether each population interacted with keratinocytes in an equivalent or different manner. Papillary and reticular fibroblasts grown in monolayer culture differed significantly from each other in their release of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) into culture medium. Some matched fibroblast couples also differed in their constitutive release of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Papillary fibroblasts produced a higher ratio of GM-CSF to KGF than did corresponding reticular fibroblasts. Interactions between site-matched papillary and reticular couples were also assayed in a three-dimensional culture system where fibroblasts and keratinocytes were randomly mixed, incorporated into type I collagen gels, and allowed to sort. Keratinocytes formed distinctive cellular masses in which the keratinocytes were organized such that the exterior most layer of cells exhibited characteristics of basal keratinocytes and the interior most cells exhibited characteristics of terminally differentiated keratinocytes. In the presence of papillary dermal fibroblasts, keratinocyte masses were highly symmetrical and cells expressed all levels of differentiation markers. In contrast, keratinocyte masses that formed in the presence of reticular fibroblasts tended to have irregular shapes, and terminal differentiation was suppressed. Furthermore, basement membrane formation was retarded in the presence of reticular cells. These studies indicate that site-matched papillary and reticular dermal fibroblasts qualitatively differ in their support of epidermal cells, with papillary cells interacting more effectively than corresponding reticular cells. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15137066     DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  30 in total

1.  Optimization of the current self-assembled urinary bladder model: Organ-specific stroma and smooth muscle inclusion.

Authors:  Hazem Orabi; Alexandre Rousseau; Veronique Laterreur; Stephane Bolduc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Influence of adult mesenchymal stem cells on in vitro vascular formation.

Authors:  J Michael Sorrell; Marilyn A Baber; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Superficial dermal fibroblasts enhance basement membrane and epidermal barrier formation in tissue-engineered skin: implications for treatment of skin basement membrane disorders.

Authors:  Mathew Varkey; Jie Ding; Edward E Tredget
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Extracellular Matrix and Dermal Fibroblast Function in the Healing Wound.

Authors:  Lauren E Tracy; Raquel A Minasian; E J Caterson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Integrative analysis of miRNA and mRNA paired expression profiling of primary fibroblast derived from diabetic foot ulcers reveals multiple impaired cellular functions.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Rivka C Stone; Olivera Stojadinovic; Horacio Ramirez; Irena Pastar; Anna G Maione; Avi Smith; Vanessa Yanez; Aristides Veves; Robert S Kirsner; Jonathan A Garlick; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Murine Dermal Fibroblast Isolation by FACS.

Authors:  Graham G Walmsley; Zeshaan N Maan; Michael S Hu; David A Atashroo; Alexander J Whittam; Dominik Duscher; Ruth Tevlin; Owen Marecic; H Peter Lorenz; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Hypertrophic Scarring: Current Knowledge of Predisposing Factors, Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Layla Nabai; Amir Pourghadiri; Aziz Ghahary
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 1.845

8.  Re-patterning of H3K27me3, H3K4me3 and DNA methylation during fibroblast conversion into induced cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ziqing Liu; Olivia Chen; Michael Zheng; Li Wang; Yang Zhou; Chaoying Yin; Jiandong Liu; Li Qian
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 9.  Biology and principles of scar management and burn reconstruction.

Authors:  Edward E Tredget; Benjamin Levi; Matthias B Donelan
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Aging alters functionally human dermal papillary fibroblasts but not reticular fibroblasts: a new view of skin morphogenesis and aging.

Authors:  Solène Mine; Nicolas O Fortunel; Hervé Pageon; Daniel Asselineau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.