Literature DB >> 1513673

Use of a distracting task to obtain defensive head movements to looming visual stimuli by human adults in a laboratory setting.

S M King1, C Dykeman, P Redgrave, P Dean.   

Abstract

Defensive responses to looming visual stimuli have been obtained in a wide variety of species, including human infants as young as one week. This phenomenon has not, however, been formally demonstrated for adults under laboratory conditions. In this paper it is reported that similar responses, namely avoidance movements of the head, can be obtained in most human adults provided that they are suitably distracted by playing a computer tracking game. Such behaviours were not obtained when subjects were not so distracted. The use of control conditions also ruled out the possibility that simple movement cues from stimuli presented on a noncollision trajectory are sufficient stimulus to obtain defensive responses. It is of interest to note that latencies for avoidance movements were significantly shorter than those for orienting movements in the same situation, but were no different from the latencies for orienting movements when subjects were not distracted. It is argued that these findings are consistent with the proposition that defensive head movements to looming stimuli, like orienting movements to novel peripheral stimuli, represent a basic visual competence that is normally suppressed (or subsumed) by higher competences. The decision to avoid is probably based on the computation of time to contact, and may reflect the operation of a subcortical system for elementary analysis of optic flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1513673     DOI: 10.1068/p210245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

Review 1.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit.

Authors:  Thomas A Münch; Rava Azeredo da Silveira; Sandra Siegert; Tim James Viney; Gautam B Awatramani; Botond Roska
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Topological Shape Changes Weaken the Innate Defensive Response to Visual Threat in Mice.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Lei Li; Kun Dong; Hongsi Tang; Qingning Yang; Xianglian Jia; Yundan Liao; Wenbo Wang; Zhen Ren; Lin Chen; Liping Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments.

Authors:  Eleonora Vagnoni; Vasiliki Andreanidou; Stella F Lourenco; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Shallow neural networks trained to detect collisions recover features of visual loom-selective neurons.

Authors:  Baohua Zhou; Zifan Li; Sunnie Kim; John Lafferty; Damon A Clark
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Center-surround interactions underlie bipolar cell motion sensitivity in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Sarah Strauss; Maria M Korympidou; Yanli Ran; Katrin Franke; Timm Schubert; Tom Baden; Philipp Berens; Thomas Euler; Anna L Vlasits
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 7.  There or not there? A multidisciplinary review and research agenda on the impact of transparent barriers on human perception, action, and social behavior.

Authors:  Gesine Marquardt; Emily S Cross; Alexandra A de Sousa; Eve Edelstein; Alessandro Farnè; Marcin Leszczynski; Miles Patterson; Susanne Quadflieg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

8.  Looming sensitive cortical regions without V1 input: evidence from a patient with bilateral cortical blindness.

Authors:  Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Lore B Legrand; Minye Zhan; Marco Tamietto; Beatrice de Gelder; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.