Literature DB >> 15136085

A poor response in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles.

Ellen R Klinkert1, Frank J M Broekmans, Caspar W N Looman, Egbert R Te Velde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with a poor response in their first IVF cycle.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization unit of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Two hundred twenty-five women who experienced a poor response in their first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. These patients were divided into 64 expected (aged > or =41 years and/or elevated FSH level) and 161 unexpected poor responders (aged <41 years and FSH level not elevated). INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization treatment with a long-suppression protocol with FSH-urofollitropin or recombinant FSH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate. This rate was calculated in two ways to correct for dropouts: pessimistic (zero chance of pregnancy for the dropouts) and optimistic (the same chance for the dropouts as for patients who continued). RESULT(S): The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of women with an unexpected poor response in the first cycle was 37% (pessimistic) to 47% (optimistic) after three cycles. Women with an expected poor response had a cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of 16% (pessimistic) to 19% (optimistic) after 3 cycles. Sixty-four percent of the unexpected poor responders and 31% of the expected poor responders had a normal response in the second cycle, most of them after receiving a higher dose of gonadotropins. CONCLUSION(S): Most patients with an unexpected poor response in the first cycle had a normal response in the second cycle, leading to an acceptable cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three cycles. Patients with an expected poor response in the first cycle should be advised to withdraw from treatment after the first cycle because of a poor prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15136085     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

Review 1.  Is there a recommended maximum starting dose of FSH in IVF?

Authors:  Luk Rombauts
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age?

Authors:  Beverley Vollenhoven; Tiki Osianlis; James Catt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Mehmet Erdem; Ahmet Erdem; Sule Yildiz; Ilknur Mutlu; Ozgur Arisoy; Mesut Oktem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Giovanna Sighinolfi; Alessandra Tirelli; Cindy Argento; Claudia Re; Daniela Tagliasacchi; Tiziana Marsella; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Basal serum level of Δ4-androstenedione reflects the ovaries' ability to respond to stimulation in IVF cycles: setting up a new reliable index of both ovarian reserve and response.

Authors:  Emanuele Garzia; Valentina Galiano; Laura Guarnaccia; Giovanni Marfia; Giulia Murru; Ellade Guermandi; Jennifer Riparini; Patrizia Sulpizio; Anna Maria Marconi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Measurement of antral follicle count in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: results of a worldwide web-based survey.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Gon Shoham; Kyle J Tobler; Yulian Zhao; Christina N Cordeiro; Milton Leong; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Live birth and cumulative live birth rates in expected poor ovarian responders defined by the Bologna criteria following IVF/ICSI treatment.

Authors:  Joyce Chai; Vivian Chi-Yan Lee; Tracy Wing-Yee Yeung; Hang Wun Raymond Li; Raymond Wun-Hang Li; Pak-Chung Ho; Ernest Hung-Yu Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone on clinical outcome in poor responders: A pilot study in women undergoing in vitro fertilization, using bologna criteria.

Authors:  Padma Rekha Jirge; Shruti Mahesh Chougule; Vijayamala Gurudas Gavali; Deepali Atul Bhomkar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-07

Review 9.  Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility.

Authors:  P Devroey; B C J M Fauser; K Diedrich
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve.

Authors:  Tal Lazer; Shir Dar; Ekaterina Shlush; Basheer S Al Kudmani; Kevin Quach; Agata Sojecki; Karen Glass; Prati Sharma; Ari Baratz; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.