Literature DB >> 15135691

Quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography for prediction of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow in acute myocardial infarction.

Stuart Moir1, Brian Haluska, Dominic Leung, Richard Lim, Paul Garrahy, Thomas H Marwick.   

Abstract

Clinical evaluation of arterial patency in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unreliable. We sought to identify infarction and predict infarct-related artery patency measured by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score with qualitative and quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). Thirty-four patients with suspected STEMI underwent MCE before emergency angiography and planned angioplasty. MCE was performed with harmonic imaging and variable triggering intervals during intravenous administration of Optison. Myocardial perfusion was quantified offline, fitting an exponential function to contrast intensity at various pulsing intervals. Plateau myocardial contrast intensity (A), rate of rise (beta), and myocardial flow (Q = A x beta) were assessed in 6 segments. Qualitative assessment of perfusion defects was sensitive for the diagnosis of infarction (sensitivity 93%) and did not differ between anterior and inferior infarctions. However, qualitative assessment had only moderate specificity (50%), and perfusion defects were unrelated to TIMI flow. In patients with STEMI, quantitatively derived myocardial blood flow Q (A x beta) was significantly lower in territories subtended by an artery with impaired (TIMI 0 to 2) flow than those territories supplied by a reperfused artery with TIMI 3 flow (10.2 +/- 9.1 vs 44.3 +/- 50.4, p = 0.03). Quantitative flow was also lower in segments with impaired flow in the subtending artery compared with "normal" patients with TIMI 3 flow (42.8 +/- 36.6, p = 0.006) and all segments with TIMI 3 flow (35.3 +/- 32.9, p = 0.018). An receiver-operator characteristic curve derived cut-off Q value of <11.3, representing impaired myocardial flow, was 73% sensitive and 67% specific for TIMI <3 flow at angiography. Thus, qualitative MCE identifies patients with STEMI but provides no information regarding infarct-related artery patency, whereas quantitative MCE can predict impaired flow in patients with acute STEMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135691     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Quantifying myocardial perfusion using contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  L Galiuto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Usefulness of peak systolic strain measurement by automated function imaging in the prediction of coronary perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jung Sun Cho; Kye Hun Kim; Woo Seok Lee; Hyun Ju Yoon; Nam Sik Yoon; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 2.884

3.  Evaluation of the effect of myocardial perfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention in coronary artery disease by using intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography and two other angiographic techniques.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Lan Huang; Jun Jin; Yaoming Song; Zhaohua Geng; Xuejun Yu; Jun Qin; Gang Zhao; Yunhua Gao; Zheng Liu; Li Yang
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-02-01

4.  Contrast echocardiography accurately predicts myocardial perfusion before angiography during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gregory B Schnell; Albert J Kryski; Luana Mann; Todd J Anderson; Israel Belenkie
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.