OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to CD4 cell count response (> or = 50 cells/mm3) among patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with and without a history of injection drug use, and to examine the potential role of non-adherence to HAART on differential CD4 responses. METHODS: Population-based analysis of treatment-naive patients initiating HAART during the period 1 August 1996 to 31 July 2000 and who were followed until 31 March 2002. Patients were stratified based on 95% adherence and history of injection drug use, and Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression were used to evaluate CD4 response rates and factors associated with CD4 responses. RESULTS: Overall, the CD4 cell count response rate was slower among injection drug users in Kaplan-Meier analyses (log-rank: P<0.05). However, no differences existed when the analyses were restricted to adherent patients (log-rank: P=0.349). Similarly, the differences in the time to CD4 cell count response observed in univariate Cox regression analyses for patients with a history of injection drug use [relative hazard: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97)] diminished after adjustment for adherence [adjusted relative hazard: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.16)]. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the importance of adherence on CD4 cell count responses and highlight the need for interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence among injection drug user.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to CD4 cell count response (> or = 50 cells/mm3) among patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with and without a history of injection drug use, and to examine the potential role of non-adherence to HAART on differential CD4 responses. METHODS: Population-based analysis of treatment-naive patients initiating HAART during the period 1 August 1996 to 31 July 2000 and who were followed until 31 March 2002. Patients were stratified based on 95% adherence and history of injection drug use, and Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression were used to evaluate CD4 response rates and factors associated with CD4 responses. RESULTS: Overall, the CD4 cell count response rate was slower among injection drug users in Kaplan-Meier analyses (log-rank: P<0.05). However, no differences existed when the analyses were restricted to adherent patients (log-rank: P=0.349). Similarly, the differences in the time to CD4 cell count response observed in univariate Cox regression analyses for patients with a history of injection drug use [relative hazard: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.97)] diminished after adjustment for adherence [adjusted relative hazard: 1.02 (95% CI: 0.89-1.16)]. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the importance of adherence on CD4 cell count responses and highlight the need for interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence among injection drug user.
Authors: Scott E Hadland; M-J Milloy; Thomas Kerr; Ruth Zhang; Silvia Guillemi; Robert S Hogg; Julio S Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Chukwuemeka N Okafor; Zhi Zhou; Larry E Burrell; Natalie E Kelso; Nicole E Whitehead; Jeffery S Harman; Christa L Cook; Robert L Cook Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Zachary L Mannes; Vaughn E Bryant; Larry E Burrell; Huiyin Lu; Erin G Ferguson; Zhi Zhou; Robert L Cook; Nicole Ennis Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: N A Mohd Salleh; N Fairbairn; S Nolan; R Barrios; J Shoveller; L Richardson; M-J Milloy Journal: HIV Med Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Keri L Calkins; Catherine R Lesko; Geetanjali Chander; Richard D Moore; Bryan Lau Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Geetanjali Chander; Seth Himelhoch; John A Fleishman; James Hellinger; Paul Gaist; Richard D Moore; Kelly A Gebo Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2009-05