Literature DB >> 15134153

Detecting fetal growth restriction or discordant growth in twin gestations stratified by placental chorionicity.

Suneet P Chauhan1, Dawn Shields, Donna Parker, Maureen Sanderson, James A Scardo, Everett F Magann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use recommendations made by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group to determine the accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal weight to diagnose fetal growth restriction (FGR) (estimated or actual birth weight < 10% for gestational age [GA]) or discordancy in dichorionic and monochiorionic twin gestations. STUDY
DESIGN: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective analysis were nonanomalous twins, reliable GA and sonographic estimate of fetal weight within 21 days of live births of both fetuses beyond 26 weeks. For likelihood ratio (LR) and odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS: Over 52 months, 126 twin gestations met the inclusion criteria; 29% were monochorionic and 71% dichorionic. The incidence of FGR in 1 of monochorionic twin fetuses (46%) was twice as high as in dichorionic (26%; OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.00, 4.03), but the rates of discordance > or = 20% were similar (21% vs. 18%, respectively; OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.64, 2.47). The LR (95% CI) of detecting discordant growth > or = 20% was 6.1 (2.5, 15.1) for dichorionic twins and 6.0 (1.8, 20.0) for monochorionic. The LR of identifying FGR in twin A and B in dichorionic twins was 6.3 (2.0, 19.7) and 8.7 (2.9, 26.9), respectively; the corresponding LR for monochorionic twins was 14.5 (1.9, 112.3) and 18.7 (2.6, 135.1). To determine the number of twins required for a tight confidence interval around an LR of 10, post hoc sample size calculations indicated: (1) regardless of chorionicity, attaining LR > 10 is not feasible; (2) in dichorionic twins, detection of FGR with twin A or B is not possible; and (3) about 500 monochorionic pregnancies are necessary to ensure that estimated fetal weight can accurately identify FGR.
CONCLUSION: Using guidelines proposed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, at present it may not befeasible to identify aberrant growth in twins.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15134153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  5 in total

1.  Discordance of prenatal and neonatal brain development in twins.

Authors:  Niyati Mukherjee; Chaeryon Kang; Honor M Wolfe; Barbara S Hertzberg; J Keith Smith; Weili Lin; Guido Gerig; Robert M Hamer; John H Gilmore
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Association between fetal sex and pregnancy outcomes among women with twin pregnancies: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Satoru Funaki; Kohei Ogawa; Nobuaki Ozawa; Satoshi Hosoya; Aikou Okamoto; Kevin Y Urayama; Naho Morisaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Jacqueline J Ho; Sharifah Halimah Jaafar; Iosief Abraha; Mohaddesseh Noura; Cassandra R Ross; Mohan Pammi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Birthweight percentiles for twin birth neonates by gestational age in China.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Zhongqiang Cao; Yiming Zhang; Cong Yao; Chao Xiong; Yaqi Zhang; Youjie Wang; Aifen Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Is growth restriction in twin pregnancies a double challenge? - A narrative review.

Authors:  Dagmara Filipecka-Tyczka; Grzegorz Jakiel; Anna Kajdy; Michał Rabijewski
Journal:  J Mother Child       Date:  2021-07-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.