BACKGROUND: Some patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) demonstrate multiple discontinuities (AH jump) in their antegrade AV node conduction curves. We evaluated and compared the immediate success rates, procedure-related complications, long-term clinical follow-up results and recurrence rates after slow pathway ablation in patients with multiple versus single or no AH jumps. METHODS: The study group consists of 278 consecutive patients (mean age 36.6 +/- 15.7) who underwent ablation for typical AVNRT, divided into three categories according to the number of AH jumps (>/=50 ms) before ablation: Group-1 consisted of 63 patients (23%) with continuous AV node function curves; Group-2 of 183 patients (66%) with a single jump and Group-3 of 32 (12%) patients showing more than one AH jumps. RESULTS: Age was significantly higher in Group-3 as compared to Group-1 (43 +/- 18 years vs. 34 +/- 16 years, p = 0.020). The electrophysiological features of AVNRT did not differ among groups. Before ablation, the maximum AH interval was significantly longer in Group-3 as compared to Groups-1 and -2 ( p < 0.001 for both). AV node antegrade ERP was significantly shorter in Group-3 than in Group-2, both before and after ablation ( p < 0.050 for both). AV node Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) was shorter in Group-3 as compared to both Groups-1 and -2, before and after ablation ( p < 0.050 for all). AV node WCL was prolonged significantly in all groups after ablation ( p < 0.001 for all). Residual dual pathways were present in 37 of 278 patients (13%) after ablation and were significantly more frequent in Group-3 than Group-2 (31% vs. 15%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with multiple AH jumps are older and more often have residual dual atrioventricular nodal pathway physiology after successful ablation but these features do not affect the immediate and long-term success rates of slow pathway ablation as compared to patients with single or no AH jumps.
BACKGROUND: Some patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) demonstrate multiple discontinuities (AH jump) in their antegrade AV node conduction curves. We evaluated and compared the immediate success rates, procedure-related complications, long-term clinical follow-up results and recurrence rates after slow pathway ablation in patients with multiple versus single or no AH jumps. METHODS: The study group consists of 278 consecutive patients (mean age 36.6 +/- 15.7) who underwent ablation for typical AVNRT, divided into three categories according to the number of AH jumps (>/=50 ms) before ablation: Group-1 consisted of 63 patients (23%) with continuous AV node function curves; Group-2 of 183 patients (66%) with a single jump and Group-3 of 32 (12%) patients showing more than one AH jumps. RESULTS: Age was significantly higher in Group-3 as compared to Group-1 (43 +/- 18 years vs. 34 +/- 16 years, p = 0.020). The electrophysiological features of AVNRT did not differ among groups. Before ablation, the maximum AH interval was significantly longer in Group-3 as compared to Groups-1 and -2 ( p < 0.001 for both). AV node antegrade ERP was significantly shorter in Group-3 than in Group-2, both before and after ablation ( p < 0.050 for both). AV node Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) was shorter in Group-3 as compared to both Groups-1 and -2, before and after ablation ( p < 0.050 for all). AV node WCL was prolonged significantly in all groups after ablation ( p < 0.001 for all). Residual dual pathways were present in 37 of 278 patients (13%) after ablation and were significantly more frequent in Group-3 than Group-2 (31% vs. 15%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with multiple AH jumps are older and more often have residual dual atrioventricular nodal pathway physiology after successful ablation but these features do not affect the immediate and long-term success rates of slow pathway ablation as compared to patients with single or no AH jumps.
Authors: C T Tai; S A Chen; C E Chiang; S H Lee; C W Chiou; K C Ueng; Z C Wen; Y J Chen; M S Chang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: W C Yu; S A Chen; C E Chiang; C T Tai; S H Lee; C W Chiou; K C Ueng; Z C Wen; Y J Chen; J L Huang; M S Chang Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: M A McGuire; M Robotin; A S Yip; J P Bourke; D C Johnson; B I Dewsnap; P Grant; J B Uther; D L Ross Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1994-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094