Literature DB >> 11039916

The effect of different light regimes on adult life span in Drosophila melanogaster is partly mediated through reproductive output.

V Sheeba1, V K Sharma, K Shubha, M K Chandrashekaran, A Joshi.   

Abstract

The effects of different light regimes on the fitness of organisms have typically been studied using mean or median adult life span as the sole index of physiological well-being. It is, however, known that life span is inversely related to reproductive output in many species. Moreover, the effects of a given environmental treatment on life span can be due to effects on either age-independent mortality or the "rate of aging," or a combination of both. Drawing evolutionary inferences from the effects of light regime on mean or median adult life span alone is difficult and, at best, speculative. We examined the effects of constant light (LL), alternating light-dark cycles (LD 12:12 h), and constant darkness (DD) on the life span of reproducing and virgin flies in four populations of Drosophila melanogaster and also estimated lifetime fecundity in the three light regimes. The light regime effects on life span were further dissected by examining the age-independent mortality and the Gompertz rate of aging under the three light regimes. While mean adult life span of reproducing males and females and virgin females was significantly shorter in LL compared to LD 12:12 h and DD, life-time egg production was highest in LL. Life span of virgin males was not significantly affected by light regime. The rate of aging in reproducing females was higher in LL as compared to DD, whereas age-independent mortality was higher in DD. As reproductive output, especially early in life, is a far more significant contributor to fitness than is life span, our results suggest that the earlier reported deleterious effects of LL on fitness are partly an artifact of examining life span alone, without considering other components of adult fitness that trade off with life span. Our results suggest that detailed investigation of the effects of light regime on the physiological and behavioral processes that accompany reproduction is necessary to fully understand the effects of different light regimes on adult fitness in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039916     DOI: 10.1177/074873000129001477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  15 in total

1.  Concordance of the circadian clock with the environment is necessary to maximize fitness in natural populations.

Authors:  Kevin J Emerson; William E Bradshaw; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Effects of light on aging and longevity.

Authors:  Jie Shen; John Tower
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Individual fecundity and senescence in Drosophila and medfly.

Authors:  Vassili N Novoseltsev; Robert Arking; James R Carey; Janna A Novoseltseva; Anatoli I Yashin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  Loss of circadian clock function decreases reproductive fitness in males of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L M Beaver; B O Gvakharia; T S Vollintine; D M Hege; R Stanewsky; J M Giebultowicz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Circadian clocks and life-history related traits: is pupation height affected by circadian organization in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; D Anitha; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Thermal adaptation in Drosophila serrata under conditions linked to its southern border: unexpected patterns from laboratory selection suggest limited evolutionary potential.

Authors:  Andréa Magiafoglou; Ary Hoffmann
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Evolution of temporal order in living organisms.

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; Vijay Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2005-05-04

9.  The genetic mechanisms of the influence of the light regime on the lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  O A Shostal; A A Moskalev
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Interaction of light regimes and circadian clocks modulate timing of pre-adult developmental events in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pankaj Yadav; Madhumohan Thandapani; Vijay Kumar Sharma
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 1.978

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.