Literature DB >> 15133014

Gas exchange during separate diaphragm and intercostal muscle breathing.

A F DiMarco1, A F Connors, K E Kowalski.   

Abstract

In patients with diaphragm paralysis, ventilation to the basal lung zones is reduced, whereas in patients with paralysis of the rib cage muscles, ventilation to the upper lung zones in reduced. Inspiration produced by either rib cage muscle or diaphragm contraction alone, therefore, may result in mismatching of ventilation and perfusion and in gas-exchange impairment. To test this hypothesis, we assessed gas exchange in 11 anesthetized dogs during ventilation produced by either diaphragm or intercostal muscle contraction alone. Diaphragm activation was achieved by phrenic nerve stimulation. Intercostal muscle activation was accomplished by electrical stimulation by using electrodes positioned epidurally at the T(2) spinal cord level. Stimulation parameters were adjusted to provide a constant tidal volume and inspiratory flow rate. During diaphragm (D) and intercostal muscle breathing (IC), mean arterial Po(2) was 97.1 +/- 2.1 and 88.1 +/- 2.7 Torr, respectively (P < 0.01). Arterial Pco(2) was lower during D than during IC (32.6 +/- 1.4 and 36.6 +/- 1.8 Torr, respectively; P < 0.05). During IC, oxygen consumption was also higher than that during D (0.13 +/- 0.01 and 0.09 +/- 0.01 l/min, respectively; P < 0.05). The alveolar-arterial oxygen difference was 11.3 +/- 1.9 and 7.7 +/- 1.0 Torr (P < 0.01) during IC and D, respectively. These results indicate that diaphragm breathing is significantly more efficient than intercostal muscle breathing. However, despite marked differences in the pattern of inspiratory muscle contraction, the distribution of ventilation remains well matched to pulmonary perfusion resulting in preservation of normal gas exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15133014     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00628.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  7 in total

1.  Stimulating multiple respiratory muscles with intramuscular Permaloc electrodes.

Authors:  James S Walter; Robert D Wurster; Qianlong Zhu; Christine Staunton; Franco Laghi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Intercostal muscle pacing with high frequency spinal cord stimulation in dogs.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 1.931

3.  Intraspinal microstimulation for respiratory muscle activation.

Authors:  Michael D Sunshine; Comron N Ganji; Paul J Reier; David D Fuller; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Inspiratory muscle pacing in spinal cord injury: case report and clinical commentary.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Raymond P Onders; Anthony Ignagni; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Physical Activity Intolerance and Cardiorespiratory Dysfunction in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Renee N Hamel; James M Smoliga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Activation of inspiratory muscles via spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.931

7.  Detecting unilateral phrenic paralysis by acoustic respiratory analysis.

Authors:  José Antonio Fiz; Raimon Jané; Manuel Lozano; Rosa Gómez; Juan Ruiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.