OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. SETTING: The Women's Center, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. DESIGN: Postal survey to 66 women undergoing conservative surgery for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. The EHP-30 and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were administered 2 weeks before the operation, and 4 months post-operatively. At T2 a transition question was included to evaluate changes in patients health status. To evaluate responsiveness effect sizes, standardised response means, the index of responsiveness and the minimally and clinically important differences were calculated. RESULTS: Forty (66.6%) patients returned the questionnaires at time 1 and 2. Overall less responsive effect size scores were found for the SF-36 (0.1-0.5) compared to the EHP-30 (-0.1-1.1) for all patients who had undergone treatment. Minimally important differences and the index of responsiveness were overall higher for the EHP-30 (0.4-2.0) compared to the SF-36 (0.1-1.0). Change scores for four of the five scales were significantly correlated with women's responses to the transition question. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the EHP-30 is sensitive to change. Its application in clinical trials should prove beneficial in assessing the impact of medical and surgical interventions upon quality of life for women with endometriosis.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity to change of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire. SETTING: The Women's Center, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford. DESIGN: Postal survey to 66 women undergoing conservative surgery for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. The EHP-30 and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were administered 2 weeks before the operation, and 4 months post-operatively. At T2 a transition question was included to evaluate changes in patients health status. To evaluate responsiveness effect sizes, standardised response means, the index of responsiveness and the minimally and clinically important differences were calculated. RESULTS: Forty (66.6%) patients returned the questionnaires at time 1 and 2. Overall less responsive effect size scores were found for the SF-36 (0.1-0.5) compared to the EHP-30 (-0.1-1.1) for all patients who had undergone treatment. Minimally important differences and the index of responsiveness were overall higher for the EHP-30 (0.4-2.0) compared to the SF-36 (0.1-1.0). Change scores for four of the five scales were significantly correlated with women's responses to the transition question. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the EHP-30 is sensitive to change. Its application in clinical trials should prove beneficial in assessing the impact of medical and surgical interventions upon quality of life for women with endometriosis.
Authors: C Paterson; C E Langan; G A McKaig; P M Anderson; G D Maclaine; L B Rose; S J Walker; M J Campbell Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2000 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: G H Guyatt; D J Eagle; B Sackett; A Willan; L Griffith; W McIlroy; C J Patterson; I Turpie Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Peter M Wayne; Catherine E Kerr; Rosa N Schnyer; Anna T R Legedza; Jacqueline Savetsky-German; Monica H Shields; Julie E Buring; Roger B Davis; Lisa A Conboy; Ellen Highfield; Barbara Parton; Phaedra Thomas; Marc R Laufer Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Arnaud Fauconnier; Cyrille Huchon; Laura Chaillou; Gabrielle Aubry; Frederique Renouvel; Pierre Panel Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Linda S Deal; Dana Britt DiBenedetti; Valerie Sl Williams; Sheri E Fehnel Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Christoph Gerlinger; Ulrike Schumacher; Thomas Faustmann; Antje Colligs; Heinz Schmitz; Christian Seitz Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 3.186