Literature DB >> 15126258

Lung cancer screening: recommendation statement.

.   

Abstract

This statement summarizes the current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for lung cancer and the supporting scientific evidence and updates the 1996 recommendations on this topic. In 1996, the USPSTF recommended against screening for lung cancer (a grade D recommendation). The Task Force now uses an explicit process in which the balance of benefits and harms is determined exclusively by the quality and magnitude of the evidence. As a result, current letter grades are based on different criteria than those used in 1996. The complete information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and references, is available in the accompanying article in this issue and in the systematic evidence review on this topic, available through the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov) and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (http://www.guideline.gov). The complete USPSTF recommendation statement (which includes a brief review of the supporting evidence) and the summary of the evidence are also available in print through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (telephone, 800-358-9295; e-mail, ahrqpubs@ahrq.gov).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126258     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-9-200405040-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  23 in total

Review 1.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Behavioral and economic impact of a familial history of cancers.

Authors:  Francois Eisinger; Carole Tarpin; Laetitia Huiart; Doug Horsman; Laetitia Rabayrol; Remi Didelot; Claire Julian-Reynier; Hagay Sobol
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Perceptions of lung cancer risk and beliefs in screening accuracy of spiral computed tomography among high-risk lung cancer family members.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Kari G Rabe; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Wesley O Petersen; Joshua Slusser; Ping Yang; Stephen J Swensen; Eric S Edell; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Recommendations on screening for lung cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  [Radiation exposure of patients from diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures. Facts, assessment and trends].

Authors:  G Brix; E Nekolla; J Griebel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Ping Yang; Stephen D Cassivi; Steven E Schild; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Overwhelming support among urban Irish COPD patients for lung cancer screening by low-dose CT scan.

Authors:  M Pallin; S Walsh; M F O'Driscoll; C Murray; A Cahalane; L Brown; M Carter; P Mitchell; T J McDonnell; M W Butler
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.