Literature DB >> 15124991

Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.

Berkman Sahiner1, Heang-Ping Chan, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Mark A Helvie, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Aditya Ramachandran, Chintana Paramagul, Gerald L LeCarpentier, Alexis Nees, Caroline Blane.   

Abstract

We are developing computer vision techniques for the characterization of breast masses as malignant or benign on radiologic examinations. In this study, we investigated the computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (US) volumetric images. We developed 2-D and 3-D active contour models for automated segmentation of the mass volumes. The effect of the initialization method of the active contour on the robustness of the iterative segmentation method was studied by varying the contour used for its initialization. For a given segmentation, texture and morphological features were automatically extracted from the segmented masses and their margins. Stepwise discriminant analysis with the leave-one-out method was used to select effective features for the classification task and to combine these features into a malignancy score. The classification accuracy was evaluated using the area Az under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, as well as the partial area index Az(0.9), defined as the relative area under the ROC curve above a sensitivity threshold of 0.9. For the purpose of comparison with the computer classifier, four experienced breast radiologists provided malignancy ratings for the 3-D US masses. Our dataset consisted of 3-D US volumes of 102 biopsied masses (46 benign, 56 malignant). The classifiers based on 2-D and 3-D segmentation methods achieved test Az values of 0.87+/-0.03 and 0.92+/-0.03, respectively. The difference in the Az values of the two computer classifiers did not achieve statistical significance. The Az values of the four radiologists ranged between 0.84 and 0.92. The difference between the computer's Az value and that of any of the four radiologists did not achieve statistical significance either. However, the computer's Az(0.9) value was significantly higher than that of three of the four radiologists. Our results indicate that an automated and effective computer classifier can be designed for differentiating malignant and benign breast masses on 3-D US volumes. The accuracy of the classifier designed in this study was similar to that of experienced breast radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15124991     DOI: 10.1118/1.1649531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Chintana Paramagul; Janet Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline Blane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Reliable evaluation of performance level for computer-aided diagnostic scheme.

Authors:  Qiang Li
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Automated volume analysis of head and neck lesions on CT scans using 3D level set segmentation.

Authors:  Ethan Street; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Sachin Gujar; Mohannad Ibrahim; Suresh K Mukherji; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jing Cui; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Alexis Nees; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou; Jiazheng Shi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Breast ultrasound lesions recognition: end-to-end deep learning approaches.

Authors:  Moi Hoon Yap; Manu Goyal; Fatima M Osman; Robert Martí; Erika Denton; Arne Juette; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-10-10

8.  A similarity study of content-based image retrieval system for breast cancer using decision tree.

Authors:  Hyun-Chong Cho; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark Helvie; Chintana Paramagul; Alexis V Nees
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Chintana Paramagul; Janet E Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline E Blane; Dorit D Adler; Stephanie K Patterson; Katherine A Klein; Renee W Pinsky; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.