Literature DB >> 15124986

A new MLC segmentation algorithm/software for step-and-shoot IMRT delivery.

Shuang Luan1, Chao Wang, Danny Z Chen, Xiaobo S Hu, Shahid A Naqvi, Cedric X Yu, Chad L Lee.   

Abstract

We present a new MLC segmentation algorithm/software for step-and-shoot IMRT delivery. Our aim in this work is to shorten the treatment time by minimizing the number of segments. Our new segmentation algorithm, called SLS (an abbreviation for static leaf sequencing), is based on graph algorithmic techniques in computer science. It takes advantage of the geometry of intensity maps. In our SLS approach, intensity maps are viewed as three-dimensional (3-D) "mountains" made of unit-sized "cubes." Such a 3-D "mountain" is first partitioned into special-structured submountains using a new mixed partitioning scheme. Then the optimal leaf sequences for each submountain are computed by either a shortest-path algorithm or a maximum-flow algorithm based on graph models. The computations of SLS take only a few minutes. Our comparison studies of SLS with CORVUS (both the 4.0 and 5.0 versions) and with the Xia and Verhey segmentation methods on Elekta Linac systems showed substantial improvements. For instance, for a pancreatic case, SLS used only one-fifth of the number of segments required by CORVUS 4.0 to create the same intensity maps, and the SLS sequences took only 25 min to deliver on an Elekta SL 20 Linac system in contrast to the 72 min for the CORVUS 4.0 sequences (a three-fold improvement). To verify the accuracy of our new leaf sequences, we conducted film and ion-chamber measurements on phantom. The results showed that both the intensity distributions as well as dose distributions of the SLS delivery match well with those of CORVUS delivery. SLS can also be extended to other types of Linac systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15124986     DOI: 10.1118/1.1646471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Computerized triplet beam orientation optimization for MRI-guided Co-60 radiotherapy.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; David Thomas; Minsong Cao; Daniel O'Connor; James Lamb; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A two-stage sequential linear programming approach to IMRT dose optimization.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Jianzhou Wu; Shahid A Naqvi; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Qihui Lyu; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The effect of gantry spacing resolution on plan quality in a single modulated arc optimization.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov; Bruce Curran; Edward Sternick
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Assessment and Comparison of Homogeneity and Conformity Indexes in Step-and-Shoot and Compensator-Based Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D CRT) in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marzieh Salimi; Kaveh Shirani Tak Abi; Hassan Ali Nedaie; Hossein Hassani; Hussain Gharaati; Mahmood Samei; Rezgar Shahi; Hamed Zarei
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Comparison of the KonRad IMRT and XiO treatment planning systems.

Authors:  Bodo Reitz; Moyed Miften
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.