Literature DB >> 15124934

Protein-ligand binding free energy estimation using molecular mechanics and continuum electrostatics. Application to HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

V Zoete1, O Michielin, M Karplus.   

Abstract

A method is proposed for the estimation of absolute binding free energy of interaction between proteins and ligands. Conformational sampling of the protein-ligand complex is performed by molecular dynamics (MD) in vacuo and the solvent effect is calculated a posteriori by solving the Poisson or the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for selected frames of the trajectory. The binding free energy is written as a linear combination of the buried surface upon complexation, SASbur, the electrostatic interaction energy between the ligand and the protein, Eelec, and the difference of the solvation free energies of the complex and the isolated ligand and protein, deltaGsolv. The method uses the buried surface upon complexation to account for the non-polar contribution to the binding free energy because it is less sensitive to the details of the structure than the van der Waals interaction energy. The parameters of the method are developed for a training set of 16 HIV-1 protease-inhibitor complexes of known 3D structure. A correlation coefficient of 0.91 was obtained with an unsigned mean error of 0.8 kcal/mol. When applied to a set of 25 HIV-1 protease-inhibitor complexes of unknown 3D structures, the method provides a satisfactory correlation between the calculated binding free energy and the experimental pIC5o without reparametrization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15124934     DOI: 10.1023/b:jcam.0000021882.99270.4c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  66 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins.

Authors:  M Schapira; M Totrov; R Abagyan
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.137

2.  A comparative study of ligand-receptor complex binding affinity prediction methods based on glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors.

Authors:  S S So; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comparative Quantitative Structureminus signActivity Relationship Studies on Anti-HIV Drugs.

Authors:  Rajni Garg; Satya P. Gupta; Hua Gao; Mekapati Suresh Babu; Asim Kumar Debnath; Corwin Hansch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-12-08       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes.

Authors:  Holger Gohlke; Christina Kiel; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

6.  Solution NMR evidence that the HIV-1 protease catalytic aspartyl groups have different ionization states in the complex formed with the asymmetric drug KNI-272.

Authors:  Y X Wang; D I Freedberg; T Yamazaki; P T Wingfield; S J Stahl; J D Kaufman; Y Kiso; D A Torchia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Genetic neural networks for quantitative structure-activity relationships: improvements and application of benzodiazepine affinity for benzodiazepine/GABAA receptors.

Authors:  S S So; M Karplus
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Structure activity relationship by NMR and by computer: a comparative study.

Authors:  Finton Sirockin; Christian Sich; Sabina Improta; Michael Schaefer; Vladimir Saudek; Nicolas Froloff; Martin Karplus; Annick Dejaegere
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  L-735,524: the design of a potent and orally bioavailable HIV protease inhibitor.

Authors:  B D Dorsey; R B Levin; S L McDaniel; J P Vacca; J P Guare; P L Darke; J A Zugay; E A Emini; W A Schleif; J C Quintero
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1994-10-14       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Structure of HIV-1 protease with KNI-272, a tight-binding transition-state analog containing allophenylnorstatine.

Authors:  E T Baldwin; T N Bhat; S Gulnik; B Liu; I A Topol; Y Kiso; T Mimoto; H Mitsuya; J W Erickson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  10 in total

1.  A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Viera Lukacova; Dogan Comez; Daniel M Kroll; Soumyendu Raha; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Processing multimode binding situations in simulation-based prediction of ligand-macromolecule affinities.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Viera Lukacova; Daniel M Kroll; Soumyendu Raha; Dogan Comez; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Improved estimation of ligand-macromolecule binding affinities by linear response approach using a combination of multi-mode MD simulation and QM/MM methods.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Prediction of aggregation rate and aggregation-prone segments in polypeptide sequences.

Authors:  Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Andrea Cavalli; Riccardo Pellarin; Amedeo Caflisch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Elucidating the energetics of entropically driven protein-ligand association: calculations of absolute binding free energy and entropy.

Authors:  Nan-jie Deng; Peng Zhang; Piotr Cieplak; Luhua Lai
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Exploration of the binding affinities between ecdysone agonists and EcR/USP by docking and MM-PB/GBSA approaches.

Authors:  Xueping Hu; Jin Xie; Song Hu; Li Zhang; Yanhong Dong
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  QM/MM linear response method distinguishes ligand affinities for closely related metalloproteins.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-11-01

8.  Computational perspectives into plasmepsins structure-function relationship: implications to inhibitors design.

Authors:  Alejandro Gil L; Pedro A Valiente; Pedro G Pascutti; Tirso Pons
Journal:  J Trop Med       Date:  2011-07-03

Review 9.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.

Authors:  Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.098

10.  Specificity and versatility of substrate binding sites in four catalytic domains of human N-terminal acetyltransferases.

Authors:  Cédric Grauffel; Angèle Abboud; Glen Liszczak; Ronen Marmorstein; Thomas Arnesen; Nathalie Reuter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.