Literature DB >> 17607744

QM/MM linear response method distinguishes ligand affinities for closely related metalloproteins.

Akash Khandelwal1, Stefan Balaz.   

Abstract

Design of selective ligands for closely related targets is becoming one of the most important tasks in the drug development. New tools, more precise than fast scoring functions and less demanding than sophisticated Free Energy Perturbation methods, are necessary to help accomplish this goal. The methods of intermediate complexity, characterizing individual contributions to the binding energy, have been an area of intense research in the past few years. Our recently developed quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) modification of the Linear Response (LR) method describes the binding free energies as the sum of empirically weighted contributions of the QM/MM interaction energies and solvent-accessible surface areas for the time-averaged structures of hydrated complexes, obtained by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The method was applied to published data on 27 inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3). The two descriptors explained 90% of variance in the inhibition constants with RMSE of 0.245 log units. The QM/MM treatment is indispensable for characterization of the systems lacking suitable force-field expressions. In this case, it provided characteristics of H-bonds of the inhibitors to Glu202, charges of binding site atoms, and accurate coordination geometries of the ligands to catalytic zinc. The geometries were constrained during the MD simulations, which characterized conformational flexibility of the complexes and helped in the elucidation of the binding differences for related compounds. A comparison of the presented QM/MM LR results with those previously published for inhibition of MMP-9 by the same set of ligands showed that the QM/MM LR approach was able to distinguish subtle differences in binding affinities for MMP-3 and MMP-9, which did not exceed one order of magnitude. This precision level makes the approach a useful tool for design of selective ligands to similar targets, because the results can be safely extrapolated to maximize selectivity. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17607744      PMCID: PMC2896063          DOI: 10.1002/prot.21500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  48 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Binding preferences of hydroxamate inhibitors of the matrix metalloproteinase human fibroblast collagenase.

Authors:  S Toba; K V Damodaran; K M Merz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): an improved knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Alexey V Ishchenko; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Binding affinity prediction with different force fields: examination of the linear interaction energy method.

Authors:  Martin Almlöf; Bjørn O Brandsdal; Johan Aqvist
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Estimation of binding free energies for HIV proteinase inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  T Hansson; J Aqvist
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1995-11

7.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Binding affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors with human thrombin using Monte Carlo simulations with a linear response method.

Authors:  D K Jones-Hertzog; W L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1997-05-09       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Crystal structure of the stromelysin catalytic domain at 2.0 A resolution: inhibitor-induced conformational changes.

Authors:  L Chen; T J Rydel; F Gu; C M Dunaway; S Pikul; K M Dunham; B L Barnett
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  QM/MM Studies of the Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) Inhibition Mechanism of (S)-SB-3CT and its Oxirane Analogue.

Authors:  Jia Zhou; Peng Tao; Jed F Fisher; Qicun Shi; Shahriar Mobashery; H Bernhard Schlegel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B.

Authors:  Antonella Ciancetta; Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Rigorous treatment of multispecies multimode ligand-receptor interactions in 3D-QSAR: CoMFA analysis of thyroxine analogs binding to transthyretin.

Authors:  Senthil Natesan; Tiansheng Wang; Viera Lukacova; Vladimir Bartus; Akash Khandelwal; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Review on the QM/MM Methodologies and Their Application to Metalloproteins.

Authors:  Christina Eleftheria Tzeliou; Markella Aliki Mermigki; Demeter Tzeli
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Quantitative three dimensional structure linear interaction energy model of 5'-O-[N-(salicyl)sulfamoyl]adenosine and the aryl acid adenylating enzyme MbtA.

Authors:  Nicholas P Labello; Eric M Bennett; David M Ferguson; Courtney C Aldrich
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Matrix metalloproteinase 2 inhibition: combined quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics studies of the inhibition mechanism of (4-phenoxyphenylsulfonyl)methylthiirane and its oxirane analogue.

Authors:  Peng Tao; Jed F Fisher; Qicun Shi; Thom Vreven; Shahriar Mobashery; H Bernhard Schlegel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  Rigorous incorporation of tautomers, ionization species, and different binding modes into ligand-based and receptor-based 3D-QSAR methods.

Authors:  Senthil Natesan; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) inhibition: DFT and QM/MM studies of the deprotonation-initialized ring-opening reaction of the sulfoxide analogue of SB-3CT.

Authors:  Peng Tao; Jed F Fisher; Qicun Shi; Shahriar Mobashery; H Bernhard Schlegel
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Binding affinity prediction for ligands and receptors forming tautomers and ionization species: inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2).

Authors:  Senthil Natesan; Rajesh Subramaniam; Charles Bergeron; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Mechanisms of Proteolytic Enzymes and Their Inhibition in QM/MM Studies.

Authors:  Brigitta Elsässer; Peter Goettig
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.