Literature DB >> 1512329

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy and cardiac mortality in atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

G C Flaker1, J L Blackshear, R McBride, R A Kronmal, J L Halperin, R G Hart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relation between cardiac mortality and antiarrhythmic drug administration has not been fully determined. This relation was analyzed in 1,330 patients enrolled in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study, a randomized clinical trial comparing warfarin, aspirin and placebo for the prevention of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
METHODS: Patients who received antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in this study were compared with patients not receiving antiarrhythmic agents. The relative risk of cardiac mortality, including arrhythmic death, in patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy was determined and adjusted for other cardiac risk factors.
RESULTS: In patients receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy, cardiac mortality was increased 2.5-fold (p = 0.006, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 4.9) and arrhythmic death was increased 2.6-fold (p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.6). Among patients with a history of congestive heart failure, those given antiarrhythmic medications had a relative risk of cardiac death of 4.7 (p less than 0.001, 95% CI 1.9 to 11.6) compared with that of patients not so treated; the relative risk of arrhythmic death in the treated group was 3.7 (p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.3 to 10.4). Patients without a history of congestive heart failure had no increased risk of cardiac mortality (relative risk 0.70, 95% CI 0.2 to 3.1) during antiarrhythmic drug therapy. After exclusion of 23 patients with documented ventricular arrhythmias and adjustment for other variables predictive of cardiac death, patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs were not at increased risk of cardiac death or arrhythmic death. However, in patients with a history of heart failure who received antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the relative risk of cardiac death was 3.3 (p = 0.05, 95% CI 0.99 to 11.1) and that of arrhythmic death was 5.8 (p = 0.009, 95% CI 1.5 to 21.7) compared with the risk in patients not taking antiarrhythmic medications.
CONCLUSIONS: Although antiarrhythmic drug therapy was not randomly determined in this trial, the data suggest that in patients with atrial fibrillation and a history of congestive heart failure, the risk of such therapy may outweigh the potential benefit of maintaining sinus rhythm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1512329     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  73 in total

Review 1.  New devices and hybrid therapies and new devices for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Antiarrhythmics--from cell to clinic: past, present, and future.

Authors:  J C Hancox; K C Patel; J V Jones
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Antiarrhythmic drugs: from mechanisms to clinical practice.

Authors:  D M Roden
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Pharmacological control of rate and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Authors:  M D Ezekowitz; R Lampert
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-08

Review 6.  A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; John Hynes; Soraya Samii; Jerry Luck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Trials of pacing to control ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Mark A Wood
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Amiodarone as a first-line drug in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: the protagonist viewpoint.

Authors:  S Lévy
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; John Hynes; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; Jerry Luck
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Low-dose amiodarone should not be the first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R J Sung
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.