Literature DB >> 15122954

Using the false memory paradigm to test two key elements of alcohol expectancy theory.

Richard R Reich1, Mark S Goldman, Jane A Noll.   

Abstract

Two key aspects of alcohol expectancy theory--(a) that memories about alcohol effects are stored as relatively cohesive templates of information and (b) that these templates are automatically activated in alcohol-related contexts--were tested using the Deese-Roediger- McDermott false memory paradigm. Alcohol expectancy adjectives were studied, and false memory for expectancy target words was tested in neutral and alcohol contexts. Results indicated that in the alcohol context heavier drinkers showed more false memory for alcohol expectancy words than they did in a neutral context. Differences were not found for lighter drinkers. These results were consistent with alcohol expectancy theory, which was then compared with various forms of association theory in explaining these results and larger issues in the addiction field. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122954     DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.12.2.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  10 in total

1.  What do you mean "drunk"? Convergent validation of multiple methods of mapping alcohol expectancy memory networks.

Authors:  Richard R Reich; Idan Ariel; Jack Darkes; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-01-30

2.  How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon; David Ceo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

3.  How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Serena L Fisher; Umit Akirmak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

4.  Memory biases in alcohol use disorder: enhanced memory for contexts associated with alcohol prospectively predicts alcohol use outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Goldfarb; Nia Fogelman; Rajita Sinha
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior.

Authors:  Alan W Stacy; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 18.561

6.  Explicit and implicit measures of expectancy and related alcohol cognitions: a meta-analytic comparison.

Authors:  Richard R Reich; Maureen C Below; Mark S Goldman
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2010-03

7.  Context effects and false memory for alcohol words in adolescents.

Authors:  Martin Zack; Justin Sharpley; Clyde W Dent; Alan W Stacy
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Alcohol expectancy priming and drinking behavior: the role of compatibility between prime and expectancy content.

Authors:  Ronald S Friedman; Denis M McCarthy; Sarah L Pedersen; Joshua A Hicks
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-06

9.  The P300 as an electrophysiological probe of alcohol expectancy.

Authors:  Inna Fishman; Mark S Goldman; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Effect of e-cigarette advertisements and antismoking messages on explicit and implicit attitudes towards tobacco and e-cigarette smoking in 18-65-year-olds: a randomised controlled study protocol.

Authors:  Paula Booth; Ian P Albery; Daniel Frings
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.