Literature DB >> 15122467

[Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].

G Winnekendonk1, B Krug, M Warm, U-J Göhring, P Mallmann, K Lackner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative contrast enhanced MR imaging in clinically, mammographically and/or ultrasonographically established breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: From September 1998 to August 1999, preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast was performed in 91 patients with lesions highly suggestive of malignancy (BIRADS IV and V) by clinical, mammographic, and/or ultrasonographic criteria. MR imaging findings were postsurgically correlated with other imaging, intraoperative and histopathologic results.
RESULTS: Histopathologic analysis revealed 61 (66 %) malignant and 31 (34 %) benign lesions. In 63 (69 %) of the 91 investigated patients, MR mammographies were classified as tumor suspect and in the remaining 28 (31 %) cases as benign. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 90 %, 67 % and 81 % for contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Additional tumor manifestations (multifocal or multicentric disease, contralateral carcinoma) were found by MR imaging alone in 10 patients (11 %).
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging may reveal unsuspected multifocal, multicentric or contralateral breast carcinoma that changes the surgical therapy if the intention is total tumor removal. The prognostic role of a potentially more radical surgical therapy on the basis of these findings is not clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122467     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques.

Authors:  P A T Baltzer; D M Renz; K-H Herrmann; M Dietzel; I Krumbein; M Gajda; O Camara; J R Reichenbach; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of fused positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance mammography: initial results.

Authors:  T A Heusner; S Hahn; C Jonkmanns; S Kuemmel; F Otterbach; M E Hamami; A R Stahl; A Bockisch; M Forsting; G Antoch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Bozzini; Giuseppe Renne; Lorenza Meneghetti; Giuseppe Bandi; Gabriela Santos; Anna Rita Vento; Simona Menna; Stefania Andrighetto; Giuseppe Viale; Enrico Cassano; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography.

Authors:  Eun-Ha Moon; Seok Tae Lim; Yeon-Hee Han; Young Jin Jeong; Yun-Hee Kang; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.